[bug-myserver] [Bugfix] myserver.cpp

2010-03-27 Thread Daniele
. I'm attaching my proposed refactoring for the mentioned code. bye ;) From 5929e427a41c920b776403100284cb52475bd923 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniele Cocca daniele.co...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:26:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Refactored the code which checks if MyServer has been called

Re: [bug-myserver] [PROPOSAL] Exception management scheme

2010-03-28 Thread Daniele
and clear your doubts, if this is the case. Cheers, Daniele 2010/3/28 Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org Hello Lisa, As we already discussed privately, it looks like a good proposal and I agree on everything. Does anyone have comments? Cheers, Giuseppe

Re: [bug-myserver] [PROPOSAL] Exception management scheme

2010-03-29 Thread Daniele
We can think of some scripts to do it automatically for us. The only thing I don't like of this solution is that we will need to keep safe synchronized every time a new function using errno appears; any idea? Yes, I see your point, but using a macro would be a quite similar situation (you

Re: [bug-myserver] toward MyServer 0.9

2009-06-19 Thread Daniele Perrone
...). 5) GUI. 6) Abstraction of configuration files. 7) Load-balancer. 8) New protocols. 9) WebDAV. 10) ... Do you see other things we have to do now? After the release? Any comment in general? Thanks, Giuseppe -- Perrone Daniele

Re: [bug-myserver] toward MyServer 0.9

2009-06-20 Thread Daniele Perrone
that). Then in the week preceding the 0.9 release, we can do strong testing again. After the 0.9 release, we can concentrate on the new features to add within MyServer, but, as we discussed along with Daniele, I think we should to do the effort to plan smaller task, each with a clearer description about