On 02/27/2014 08:43 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Let's have a look at your boot sector... please run sudo dd
> if=/dev/sdc14 count=1 | xxd.
>
dd if=/dev/sdc14 count=1 | xxd
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
512 bytes (512 B) copied000: eb58 9000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/2014 02:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Brian C. Lane
> wrote:
>>
>> parted's filesystem detection should not be depended on, it is
>> for cosmetic purposes only. I'm not sure what gparted is doing,
>> but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Let's have a look at your boot sector... please run sudo dd
if=/dev/sdc14 count=1 | xxd.
On 02/27/2014 03:40 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
> As a follow up to my report, here is the 'parted' display for the
> disk in which the FAT32 partition is not bein
On 2/27/2014 2:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>>
>> parted's filesystem detection should not be depended on, it is for
>> cosmetic purposes only. I'm not sure what gparted is doing, but it
>> shouldn't be failing because of libparted's fs display.
On 2/27/2014 2:22 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at
03:40:47AM -0500, Edward Diener wrote:
>> As a follow up to my report, here is the 'parted' display for the
>> disk in which the FAT32 partition is not being recognized using
>> 'parted 3.1'.
>>
>> Model: ATA WDC WD20EARX-00P (sc
On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> parted's filesystem detection should not be depended on, it is for
> cosmetic purposes only. I'm not sure what gparted is doing, but it
> shouldn't be failing because of libparted's fs display.
yes. gparted should be relying on libblkid, if
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:40:47AM -0500, Edward Diener wrote:
> As a follow up to my report, here is the 'parted' display for the
> disk in which the FAT32 partition is not being recognized using
> 'parted 3.1'.
>
> Model: ATA WDC WD20EARX-00P (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdc: 2000GB
> Sector size (logical
As a follow up to my report, here is the 'parted' display for the disk
in which the FAT32 partition is not being recognized using 'parted 3.1'.
Model: ATA WDC WD20EARX-00P (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdc: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start
I have a FAT32 logical partition on an MBR hard drive. The partition ID
is 0xb and the partition is successfully shared between Windows7,
Windows Vista, and various Linux distros.
In 'parted-3.1' if I 'print' the drive (/dev/sdc), the output does not
show the type of the partition. If I try to
