On 12/4/2016 3:14 PM, Volta wrote:
> On 4 December 2016 at 01:55, Josep Lladonosa wrote:
>> Maybe this value is not drive related but usb bus related. Is that a usb
>> drive? I guess so. Found similar cases. One of them:
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=linux-...@vger.kernel.org&q=subje
On 4 December 2016 at 01:55, Josep Lladonosa wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2016 05:40, "Volta" wrote:
>> 1 not aligned
>> 1 aligned
>> -- 8< --
>>
>> So, I fell back to how we used to do this, but the numbers are... weird:
>>
>> -- 8< --
>> $ cat /sys/block/sdi/queue/optimal_io_size
>> 33553920
>
> Maybe thi
On 4 Dec 2016 05:40, "Volta" wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug in parted (parted 3.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS
x86-64), or a bug in my understanding of the concepts. Either way I'd like
to know.
>
> I've got a new 8TB drive for which the "optimal" alignment calculated by
parted doesn't satisfy
I'm not sure if this is a bug in parted (parted 3.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS
x86-64), or a bug in my understanding of the concepts. Either way I'd like
to know.
I've got a new 8TB drive for which the "optimal" alignment calculated by
parted doesn't satisfy the "minimal" alignment check. My understand
