Re: [Bug-tar] ACL support in git version of GNU tar

2013-04-26 Thread Markus Steinborn
Hi, I'd like to remind the maintainers of GNU tar to the following post to bug-tar: Markus Steinborn schrieb: Hi everybody, Today I noticed that GNU tar (git master) now supports XATTRs, ACLs and SELINUX-Attributes. I am really pleased to read this in git log. Congratualtions for this

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/26/2013 12:56 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: So you think something like remove the leading path '/usr/bin/' before comparison with 'GZIP_PROGRAM'? I'm afraid that will lead to even more confusion; among other things, tar shouldn't care what the program names are. It may be better to have two

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Pavel Raiskup
When tar infers a compressor it can also infer which of these two options to use. That means, using the -Z, -z, .. options will setup some new flag, same as the new use-compress-program-like option will. Do you have some requirements for this option name? This is the hard one.. Would you be

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/26/2013 01:17 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Do you have some requirements for this option name? We could have --use-compress-program for the compress API, and --use-filter-program for the more-vanilla API. Or something like that. I'm fine with your preparing a patch.

Re: [Bug-tar] ACL support in git version of GNU tar

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Eggert
That sort of thing all sounds reasonable, I guess. I'd like Sergey's opinion though.

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Friday, April 26, 2013 01:36:02 AM Paul Eggert wrote: On 04/26/2013 01:17 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Do you have some requirements for this option name? We could have --use-compress-program for the compress API, and --use-filter-program for the more-vanilla API. Or something like that.

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/26/2013 03:07 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: -I, --use-filter-program (general 'vanilla' API) --use-compress-program (obsoleted alias to ^^^) // remove from --help man info to not confuse people --use-compress-like-program (with a *proper* definition what it does) // or

Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Do not fail when 'compress' is unable to provide sufficient compress ratio

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/26/2013 10:07 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: Converting gzip to the general API seems the right thing to do in the long term. That might be wise, yes, but there might be other users who expect the current behavior, and we'd need to consult with them. And there are a lot of other compressor