* configure.ac: Use AC_ARG_VAR([RSH],[...]).
---
configure.ac | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 3303c53..a4e2301 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([time],,, [#include time.h])
Hello.
There's an old bugreport in Debian about symlink-eating behavour
of tar, which were considered unreproducible for quite some time --
http://bugs.debian.org/452365 .
Recently I managed to hit this bug too, and after some tries
created a reproducer from my files. I attached the reproducer
Hello.
There's an old bugreport in Debian about symlink-eating behavour
of tar, which were considered unreproducible for quite some time --
http://bugs.debian.org/452365 .
Recently I managed to hit this bug too, and after some tries
created a reproducer from my files. I attached the reproducer
Hello.
There's an old bugreport in Debian about symlink-eating behavour
of tar, which were considered unreproducible for quite some time --
http://bugs.debian.org/452365 .
Recently I managed to hit this bug too, and after some tries
created a reproducer from my files. I attached the reproducer
I'm sorry for TRIPLE (!) post. Since I got no usual reply
from mailman (telling me my post awaits moderator action),
I went off and subscribed to the list, and resent, because
I thought that because of spam volume the non-subscriber
posts are just deleted (it is often the case in various
places
Thanks, I just now reproduced the problem with tar 1.26 but could
not reproduce it with the latest git version.
this appears to be similar to this bug:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2011-06/msg0.html
which was fixed in tar upstream, here:
