Hi Sergey,
Just treat warnings as warnings :) Or apply the following patch, which
I have just pushed to the repository.
thanks, I was able to recompile it - but I wanted exactly that ^^^ push
from you. Thanks a lot for your work.
I'm looking at the patch once again. Basically, I like the
- the semantics of -T option changed in relation to -C option. I am
unable to find any note in changelog that this is expected - so I'm just
not sure. Do you really want that?
Actually, yes. I think that -C should affect all options that follow
it. I indeed failed to list that in
What do you mean by 're-definition' ? Mentioning the same file twice ?
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com ha escrit:
tar -cvvf test.tar -T LIST1 -T LIST1 -T LIST2
Before these changes, tar failed immediately (before even tried to store
files defined in LIST1). Now it firstly stores everything from FILE1 and
then fails (it may take hours to process FILE1 to
On 13/08/13 08:56 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Connor Behan wrote:
This could be handled without adding a new option
if -k became don't replace existing files or create more than one file
at the top level when extracting, treat them as errors. So -k would
become a broader kind of play it safe
