Tyson Tucker tyson.tuc...@gmail.com ha escrit:
I haven't figured out what makes the duplicate files/directories
special, but some are duplicated up to three times in the tar file.Â
I've tested it on versions 1.17 and 1.22 on Solaris and 1.22 on Linux.
To reproduce:
find
blackhol...@suddenlink.net ha escrit:
I was wondering if somebody could help me with the syntax for
extracting an archive with an absolute path name in Windows. If I
change to the directory where the file is I can extract it, but if I
try to call the tar command with the path I always get an
mehdi farokhi mehdi.faro...@gmail.com ha escrit:
# tar -xf /dev/st0
tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
This can happen if you are trying to read a multivolume archive without
the `-M' option. Try tar -M -xf /dev/st0
tar: home/shares/SupplyChain/jghods/DESKTOP 111: implausibly old time
Gargi Thakur gargithaku...@gmail.com ha escrit:
- Check version of tar. The version may not support files more than
2GB.
Tar imposes no limits on the size of files it can handle. However, such
limits are often imposed by file system. Additionally, some tar
archive formats also limit the
amit0 ~ # tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.20
I read in the manpage:
QUOTE
--owner USER
change owner of extraced files to USER
QUOTE/
Nevertheless I can't get --owner and --group to work when extracting an
archive. Files in archive are owned by root:
amit0 ~ # mkdir
Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com ha escrit:
amit0 ~ # tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.20
I read in the manpage:
QUOTE
--owner USER
change owner of extraced files to USER
The manpage is wrong. The --owner option works only when
creating archives. See the GNU tar
ajmcello ajmcell...@gmail.com ha escrit:
Hi. I thought I would forward this to the tar group. Is it possible to
have tar fallback to UID and GID 0 or the owner and group of the person
running tar in the event that it cannot change it, particularly over
NFS?
Currently it is not
A user of Debian noticed that tar (1.22) does not always preserve hard
links when creating an archive with the --remove-files option. Ted Ts'o
provided the following analysis:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 15:45:27 -0400, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure, by the way, that the problem is
Hi there..
i just stumbled over the same problem when transforming hardlinks..
the following short patch fixes the problem for me.. (without applying
the previous patch)
since i haven't found a final fix here is my solution just for your
information 8)..
grettings from berlin/germany..
Hi Marius,
i just stumbled over the same problem when transforming hardlinks..
the following short patch fixes the problem for me.. (without applying
the previous patch)
Thanks for the suggestion.
since i haven't found a final fix here is my solution just for your
information 8)..
The
Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org ha escrit:
A user of Debian noticed that tar (1.22) does not always preserve hard
links when creating an archive with the --remove-files option.
Thanks for reporting.
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 15:45:27 -0400, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
I'm pretty sure, by the
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 23:52 +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
Thanks for reporting.
Thank you, Sergey. And thanks for the quick reply.
This one is mostly OK, except that I don't see any reason to test the
remove_files_option value in file_count_links. This will unnecessarily
inflate the
12 matches
Mail list logo
