See the discussion December 2014:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2014-12/threads.html#00059
The DocBook output for @indentedblock is still (at least in 6.1) broken:
It just creates a with the contents.
On the other hand, @quotation creates a around the contents.
My suggestion
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Mahlon wrote:
> Yes, that's an interesting idea. @quotation, @indentedblock, @example,
> @display and their @small. . . counterparts could receive class
> designations.
I believe they already have class designations that you could use to
apply your own CSS.
> I
On 12/21/2014 01:53 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
On 12/20/2014 09:11 AM, Mahlon wrote:
I agree with Karl on the issue of broadening the use of
for indentation. The strength of having several block types is that
each block type has its special characteristics: Indentation, font
type inheritance/rep
On 12/20/2014 09:11 AM, Mahlon wrote:
I agree with Karl on the issue of broadening the use of
for indentation. The strength of having several block types is that
each block type has its special characteristics: Indentation, font
type inheritance/replacement, preformatting, font size. Maintaini
On 18 Dec. Gavin wrote:
What @example, @display, etc., have in common with @indentedblock is
that they should be indented, and that they are currently indented
with CSS instead of being put in a . If we want to avoid
relying on CSS when possible then we should consider using
for these other
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> for example using semantic
> output could allow better accessibility
>
> No question. But that's not what's going on here.
> Neither nor css indent is especially semantic.
> If anything, is more so.
>
> Aside: Indeed, one of my recur
for example using semantic
output could allow better accessibility
No question. But that's not what's going on here.
Neither nor css indent is especially semantic.
If anything, is more so.
Aside: Indeed, one of my recurring problems with CSS is that it is
routinely used to (try to) for
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ineiev wrote:
> I attach what lynx prints for me (what I see on the screen is colored,
> but the indents are the same). The first paragraph, "Here is
> an indented block:", has the same indent as the subsequent one,
> "US and Cuba are to start talks to normalise...
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:05:02PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Ineiev wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:41:40PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> >> I just tried the HTML output for @indentedblock in Lynx 2.8.7rel.1,
> >> and surprisingly the @indentedblock was inden
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Ineiev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:41:40PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
>> > (BTW, does lynx/etc. render CSS?)
>> >
>>
>> I just tried the HTML output for @indentedblock in Lynx 2.8.7rel.1,
>> and surpris
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:41:40PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> > (BTW, does lynx/etc. render CSS?)
> >
>
> I just tried the HTML output for @indentedblock in Lynx 2.8.7rel.1,
> and surprisingly the @indentedblock was indented (although by a
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> I am aware that W3C wants everyone to use CSS for everything, but my
> experience with what works best is different, and I don't think it's a
> good idea to just do things because W3C says so.
>
> Using basic HTML tags like that have been arou
I am aware that W3C wants everyone to use CSS for everything, but my
experience with what works best is different, and I don't think it's a
good idea to just do things because W3C says so.
Using basic HTML tags like that have been around since the
early years, even though W3C does not like them,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> May I suggest some tweaks for how @quotation and @indentedblock are
> translated?
>
> Currently, in HTML, @quotation becomes a , while @indentedblock
> becomes plain - and then we use CSS to indent.
> This fails if stylesheets are disabled, or
[Thanks for the @sup and @sub feature, btw!]
May I suggest some tweaks for how @quotation and @indentedblock are translated?
Currently, in HTML, @quotation becomes a , while @indentedblock
becomes plain - and then we use CSS to indent.
This fails if stylesheets are disabled, or the default CSS
15 matches
Mail list logo
