Re: Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-08-23 Thread Karl Berry
\initial {\\} As I recall, Arnold and I did that as part of the new texindex, so that backslashes could be properly sorted, etc. It seems semantically correct to me. Trying to treat {\tt \indexbackslash } as equivalent to \ seemed poor design. (Ultimately, what I really want is for the

Re: Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-08-22 Thread Gavin Smith
On 6 July 2015 at 01:42, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: sorry for the noise. The problem lies with octave shipping an ancient texinfo.tex (2009?). For what it's worth, I just had the exact same problem trying to compile an old gawk manual (for gawk 3.1.4), again breaking on a line

Re: Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-07-06 Thread Gavin Smith
On 6 July 2015 at 01:42, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: I had to change two occurrences of @SOMECMD{\X} to @SOMECMD{\\X} Is this expected? Yes. See this thread from a few days ago: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2015-07/msg2.html

Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-07-05 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi everyone, I faintly remember seeing this on the list here, but cannot find it now in my texinfo mailbox. Anyone remebers something concerning this: ./octave.cps:56: Argument of \\ has an extra }. inserted text \par to be read again } \initial ... .5

Re: Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-07-05 Thread Karl Berry
l.56 \initial {\\} Works for me with current texinfo.tex and the input below (to force creating the \initial line). I don't doubt there was a bug in some version of texinfo.tex in this regard, but I routinely run Texinfo documents with \indexentries, so I doubt it existed for long. -k

Re: Argument of \\ has an extra } ??

2015-07-05 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi everyone, (short: one problem solved, another appeared: @SOMECMD{\X} does not work) Works for me with current texinfo.tex and the input below (to force sorry for the noise. The problem lies with octave shipping an ancient texinfo.tex (2009?). Removing it did bring up two new errors: As of