Note that the whitespace in the header is retained, while the whitespace
in the line items is compressed, which causes vertical misalignment.
What I see is not related to whitespace in the input. Consider:
@multitable {California} {Sacramento} {California poppy}
@headitem State @tab Ca
Pat,
On the issue of separating the header line from the table contents, I
agree that it is a minor issue. Inside a sequence, the header
is bold by default, so it is visually distinct from the non-bold
line items.
The issue of compressed whitespace is a problem without the CSS. For
examp
Normally, @sp 1 becomes one , so it should appear?
Inside , I think it would have to be a blank row
( or some such). I'm not sure if it's desirable.
> Some tables in the source will specify line spacing and some will not.
Texinfo has never been about precisely specifying the appearance
Hello,
A disclaimer, I don't know CSS at all, so I may be misunderstanding many
issues.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:51:41AM +0800, Mahlon wrote:
> Hi Gavin,
>
> I agree that the HTML is straightforward, but here are my specific concerns.
>
> 1) In the info output, there is an 'underline' after
Hi Gavin,
I agree that the HTML is straightforward, but here are my specific concerns.
1) In the info output, there is an 'underline' after the header line,
but no underline in HTML.
2) HTML compresses whitespace, so line-item columns appear much closer
together than in the info output. Unfo
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Mahlon wrote:
> Without the application of CSS style, the HTML output for both @table and
> @multitable could be considered unacceptable for two reasons:
>
> 1) the formatting of the HTML output is rather embarrassing, and
>
> 2) it doesn't much resemble the 'info'
20 Nov 2014
RE: HTML output for @table and @multitable
VERSION: makeinfo 5.2 (built from source on Fedora 20 x86_64)
/I sincerely apologize for monopolizing your time.
Only one more to report after this one, I promise (but it's a big one)./
BUG:
Without the application of CSS style
