On 19 September 2016 at 13:29, Gavin Smith wrote:
> \indexlbrace ->{\ifmonospace \else \ecfont
>\fi \char 123}
I don't know where this definition is coming from: it should be the
following definition:
On 19 September 2016 at 13:03, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have located the problem with help from my colleague (Vitezslav Crhonek,
> maintainer of texinfo). For some reason, the newer version of texinfo (6.1+)
> is unable to fallback to different fonts
"David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]" wrote:
> I guess I didn't make myself clear. By default the vanilla source code is
> used during build inside mock, no modifications to it are currently there.
> So, when I try the build for 4.1.4, it uses the texinfo.tex shipped with
> gawk. There
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:22 PM, wrote:
> Hi David.
>
> You need to figure out how to get mock to use the texinfo.tex shipped
> with gawk. Mock is stil using an older version. I support building the doc
> with what I ship. But not otherwise.
I guess I didn't make myself
Hi David.
You need to figure out how to get mock to use the texinfo.tex shipped
with gawk. Mock is stil using an older version. I support building the doc
with what I ship. But not otherwise.
It may be that you need to move to Texinfo 6.1 (or even the just released
Texinfo 6.3) for the latest
Hello guys,
I was in a hurry yesterday, so I have accidentally sent the wrong log
file... :-/ Today, I looked into this more:
* I am able to create documentation if I normally use 'make -C doc/ pdf' or
'cd doc && make pdf && cd ..' for gawk-4.1.4 in my Fedora 24.
* The problem occurs when I try
Gavin Smith wrote:
> On 12 September 2016 at 18:52, wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> >> there seems to be a regression for the documentation of gawk. I'm not able
> >> to compile the PDF version of it with current version 4.1.4. I was able to
> >> compile it in
On 12 September 2016 at 18:52, wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> there seems to be a regression for the documentation of gawk. I'm not able
>> to compile the PDF version of it with current version 4.1.4. I was able to
>> compile it in the same way for 4.1.3.
>>
>> There's a lot of output
Hi.
> there seems to be a regression for the documentation of gawk. I'm not able
> to compile the PDF version of it with current version 4.1.4. I was able to
> compile it in the same way for 4.1.3.
>
> There's a lot of output during compilation, and unfortunately I do not have
> time to look at