On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:28:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 09:42:51AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > Now only the files that are directly produced are compared, not the
> > sorted index files.
>
> This has the unfortunate effect that if the sorted index files are
>
(replying to old message)
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 09:42:51AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> Now only the files that are directly produced are compared, not the
> sorted index files.
This has the unfortunate effect that if the sorted index files are
missing but the unsorted index files aren't,
[...]
>
> They you can't know what the next step if (bibtex, makeglossaries,
> biber, makeindex, texindex, ...)...
>
[...]
I meant "The*n* you can't know what the next step i*s*"
Sorry for the typoes,
Vincent.
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
On 24 September 2015 at 21:54, Vincent Belaïche
wrote:
>> I pointed out that the log files were being grep'd a lot to get the
>> list of generated files. This won't happen as much now.
>>
>
> I have seen that what you have done goes far beyond reverting the
> TEXINPUTS
Le 25/09/2015 10:42, Gavin Smith a écrit :
> On 24 September 2015 at 21:54, Vincent Belaïche
> wrote:
>>> I pointed out that the log files were being grep'd a lot to get the
>>> list of generated files. This won't happen as much now.
>>>
>>
[...]
>
> IIRC this
On 22 September 2015 at 23:34, Karl Berry wrote:
> gs> Can anybody try the script with LaTeX source with BibTeX, or
> else send me a test case? I want to make sure the BibTeX files are
> checked properly.
>
>
> % bibsimple.tex
>
+ if test $generated_files_get_method = generated_files_get_from_fls; then
+if test -f "$in_noext.fl"; then
+ report 'WARNING!! You may typeset garbage!' # goes to stderr
+fi
+ fi
(Aside: I usually find test -r more useful than test -f, because if by
some weird
On 22 September 2015 at 23:55, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Gavin,
>
> gs> If someone uses an "fl" index with the recorder, I expect either
> the index to be blank, or to be the recorder file interpreted as TeX
> source (a great ugly mess).
>
> There's a comment in
Hi Gavin,
gs> If someone uses an "fl" index with the recorder, I expect either
the index to be blank, or to be the recorder file interpreted as TeX
source (a great ugly mess).
There's a comment in texi2dvi that says
# The default behaviour is `nomaybe'.
But the actual default for
On 22 September 2015 at 23:55, Karl Berry wrote:
> Excuse my opinion, but this seems like the worst possible outcome. This
> way, an existing document that uses an fl index (as discussed, they
> exist) will silently typeset garbage with a new texi2dvi. Thus, with
> the
gs> Can anybody try the script with LaTeX source with BibTeX, or
else send me a test case? I want to make sure the BibTeX files are
checked properly.
% bibsimple.tex
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\nocite{*}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{xampl}
Hi Akim,
How is this code expected to disable the magic tricks it plays with ~?
It should only be enabled when the source is texinfo, not latex.
Can you make that change?
The way things have turned out, I rather think latex2dvi should have
been a separate script. Most of what's in texi2dvi
12 matches
Mail list logo