HI Karl, hi all,
I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now,
but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From
the build error log (excerpt)
../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4378: warning: @itemx should not begin
@table
../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4378: warning: @itemx should not
begin @table
../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4386: @itemx must follow @item
It's a real error in the Texinfo, that unfortunately C makeinfo did not
diagnose. It needs to be reported to the binutils maintainers.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
HI Karl, hi all,
I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now,
but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From
the build error log (excerpt)
Hi Patrice,
Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
errors.
Core of the patch is
s/itemx/item/
right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes.
Norbert
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Patrice,
Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
errors.
Core of the patch is
s/itemx/item/
right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes.
The patch handles errors/warnings
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Patrice,
Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
errors.
Core of the patch is
s/itemx/item/
right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes.
The patch handles errors/warnings
Hi Patrice,
thanks a lot!
On Sa, 05 Jan 2013, Patrice Dumas wrote:
The patch handles errors/warnings for the other manuals.
Other changes allow to
* remove warnings about node next in menu and sectionning differing
* remove errors about @colophon and @cygnus commands not defined
binutils
On Mi, 02 Jan 2013, Karl Berry wrote:
http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.93.tar.xz
Without changing much build in a clean chroot on Debian fails now,
because help2man is missing, and it tries to re-generated texi2dvi.1
Is there a reason for that?
(I didn't change anything wrt the
