Re: makeinfo bug

2014-08-21 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:55:56PM +, Karl Berry wrote: Hi Mahlon, The largest of these is that v:5.1 ignores the '--fill-column' option. Thanks for the report. It seems that the value from the cmdline was not being propagated to the parsing; the change below appears to fix this.

Re: makeinfo bug

2014-08-21 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:55:56PM +, Karl Berry wrote: The largest of these is that v:5.1 ignores the '--fill-column' option. Thanks for the report. It seems that the value from the cmdline was not being propagated to the parsing; the change below appears to fix this. I can't say

Re: [bug #43042] Texinfo manual typo and improvement in info node 'Node Line Requirements'

2014-08-21 Thread Gavin Smith
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Vincent Belaïche invalid.nore...@gnu.org wrote: = References = See bug report on EMACS info viewer http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18308#11. = Position of problem = In texinfo manual info node `(texinfo) Node Line Requirements', one can read

[bug #43045] texi2any does not collapse to one space multiple spaces within node names

2014-08-21 Thread Vincent Belaïche
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43045 Summary: texi2any does not collapse to one space multiple spaces within node names Project: texinfo - GNU documentation system Submitted by: vincentb1 Submitted on: jeu. 21 août 2014 21:48:50 GMT

Re: [bug #43042] Texinfo manual typo and improvement in info node 'Node Line Requirements'

2014-08-21 Thread Vincent Belaïche
Gavin Smith a écrit : On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Vincent Belaïche [...] = Clarifying _References_ = Furthermore, what _References_ means it a bit ambiguous. I understand that it means references in the texinfo manual source code, and that it is one of the following: * a @ref,

Re: makeinfo bug

2014-08-21 Thread Karl Berry
except that I would have placed it a bit later. I'll do it and commit. 1) It seems your patch did not remove my block, so now those four lines are in two places. 2) In fact, I originally tried putting it later in the fn, which looks more natural given the existing code. However, I found

Re: makeinfo bug

2014-08-21 Thread Karl Berry
Also, I am not sure we should add a test for it. If we do, then we should also add a test for every command-line option and I am not sure we want that. Why not? Anyway, I don't think we're necessarily obliged to test every single cmdline option, and it wouldn't even be possible to