Re: XeTeX encoding problem

On 22 March 2016 at 15:29, Masamichi HOSODA wrote: > I've made a patch that improves XeTeX PDF support. > This patch adds PDF table of contents page number link support. I really don't understand the code in \pdfgettoks in texinfo.tex. Does anyone know what it's doing? It

Re: XeTeX encoding problem

On 22 March 2016 at 15:29, Masamichi HOSODA wrote: > I've made a patch that improves XeTeX PDF support. > This patch adds PDF table of contents page number link support. > > Would you commit it? > Or, may I commit it? > > Additionaly, > I'll make @email and @xref,

Re: XeTeX encoding problem

I've made a patch that improves XeTeX PDF support. This patch adds PDF table of contents page number link support. Would you commit it? Or, may I commit it? Additionaly, I'll make @email and @xref, \urefurlonlylinktrue link support for XeTeX. ChangeLog: XeTeX PDF TOC page number link support

Re: XeTeX encoding problem

>> but I want to understand what the point of the \edef was in the first >> place, and what the point was of changing the catcode of backslash, >> and test whether this is still necessary. Hopefully I'll get to this >> soon. > > I've committed a new change that should make special Unicode >

Re: XeTeX encoding problem

On 20 March 2016 at 19:43, Gavin Smith wrote: > > but I want to understand what the point of the \edef was in the first > place, and what the point was of changing the catcode of backslash, > and test whether this is still necessary. Hopefully I'll get to this > soon.