On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:05:18AM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> However, I doubt that it is justified to rename it. We know it is an
> option, so what is the point of putting _OPTION on the end to get
> PACKAGE_VERSION_OPTION?
Thinking more about it, I think that there is a point in having a
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:05:18AM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> However, I doubt that it is justified to rename it. We know it is an
> option, so what is the point of putting _OPTION on the end to get
> PACKAGE_VERSION_OPTION?
I chose that way because I imagined that using PACKAGE_VERSION only
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 16:38 +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 01:10:47PM +, Sam James wrote:
> >
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> >
> > > Hi Gavin!
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 11:00 +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > > The line in question is:
> > > >
> >
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 12:03 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Gavin!
>
> On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 11:00 +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > The line in question is:
> >
> > memcpy (targets, list_of_labels, labels_number * sizeof(LABEL));
> >
> > - again, the second argument of memcpy.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:54:52PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> [CCing bug-libunistring]
> Gavin Smith wrote:
> > I did not understand why uc_width was said to be "locale dependent":
> >
> > "These functions are locale dependent."
> >
> > - from
> >
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 12:13:00PM +0100, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Oh, interesting. On my system, I'm using texinfo built from master, and
> it completely lacks PACKAGE_VERSION! (if I rebuild from releases/7.1,
> it's present). It looks like it got removed in
>