On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:58:29PM +, Karl Berry wrote:
> Evidently most web browsers aren't intended to be used as viewers for
> XML files following arbitrary DTD's.
>
> Evidently. So I think the manual should say this, that the XML output
> cannot be viewed directly in a browser,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:30:38PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
>
> I'd drop it in favor of --xhtml,
> where --xhtml is the same as --html except strictly XML compatible - with
> no required DTDs or entity definitions.
Isn't the html generated already XHTML compatible? I remember vaguely
this
On 02/09/2016 02:28 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:30:38PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
I'd drop it in favor of --xhtml,
where --xhtml is the same as --html except strictly XML compatible - with
no required DTDs or entity definitions.
Isn't the html generated already
On 6 February 2016 at 01:30, Per Bothner wrote:
> What is the use case for --xml format? I'd drop it in favor of --xhtml,
> where --xhtml is the same as --html except strictly XML compatible - with
> no required DTDs or entity definitions.
I wondered the same myself; here is a
Evidently most web browsers aren't intended to be used as viewers for
XML files following arbitrary DTD's.
Evidently. So I think the manual should say this, that the XML output
cannot be viewed directly in a browser, and is thus only intended for
further processing by other software.
On 6 February 2016 at 00:50, Karl Berry wrote:
> I believe that it does not follow the uri in the document DOCTYPE
> definition
>
> Well, evidently not, since
> http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/dtd/6.0/texinfo.dtd is found just
> fine when visited directly.
I believe that it does not follow the uri in the document DOCTYPE
definition
Well, evidently not, since
http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/dtd/6.0/texinfo.dtd is found just
fine when visited directly. Unless there is an error in the dtd
preventing it from being applied, which is
On 02/05/2016 04:50 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
I believe that it does not follow the uri in the document DOCTYPE
definition
Well, evidently not, since
http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/dtd/6.0/texinfo.dtd is found just
fine when visited directly. Unless there is an error in the dtd
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:01:12PM +, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Gavin - another long-pending thing I haven't had a chance to get to the
> bottom of. The TexinfoXML file generated here,
> http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.xml
> visited in a browser, gives the
Hi Gavin - another long-pending thing I haven't had a chance to get to the
bottom of. The TexinfoXML file generated here,
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.xml
visited in a browser, gives the error:
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location:
10 matches
Mail list logo