On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:51:30PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-10-26 21:31:24 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > For long formulas, it may be better to have separate text for TeX and
> > > for the other formats (we
On 2022-10-26 21:31:24 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > For long formulas, it may be better to have separate text for TeX and
> > for the other formats (we already have a macro for that): for long
> > formulas in TeX, a centered
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> For long formulas, it may be better to have separate text for TeX and
> for the other formats (we already have a macro for that): for long
> formulas in TeX, a centered formula is generally preferred, with
> @displaymath I assume.
On 2022-10-26 11:13:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > However, for the Info output at least (and I assume that this is
> > also the case for the HTML output), @w is really necessary. See
> > the differences:
>
> Indeed. However,
On 2022-10-26 09:44:05 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > In theory, there could be better output if we could change the size
> > > of spaces inside of @w, but I doubt that there is a good way of
> > > achieving this in TeX.
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> However, for the Info output at least (and I assume that this is
> also the case for the HTML output), @w is really necessary. See
> the differences:
Indeed. However, for longer formulas, there will be a point where
breaking the
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:44:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > In theory, there could be better output if we could change the size
> > of spaces inside of @w, but I doubt that there is a good way of
> > achieving this in TeX.
>
> I had looked at tex.stackexchange.com and found
>
>
On 2022-10-25 14:42:20 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 02:41:48PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > @w doesn't work correctly in math mode:
> >
> >
> > \input texinfo@c -*-texinfo-*-
> > @documentencoding UTF-8
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 02:41:48PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> @w doesn't work correctly in math mode:
>
>
> \input texinfo@c -*-texinfo-*-
> @documentencoding UTF-8
>
> @node Top
> @node Test
>
> Formatting test.
>
>
On 2022-10-16 12:18:51 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 12:40:32PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > The spaces in math mode can normally stretch and shrink (not in
> > the same way as outside of math mode, though). But there are some
> > TeX commands that changes spaces to
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 12:40:32PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The spaces in math mode can normally stretch and shrink (not in
> the same way as outside of math mode, though). But there are some
> TeX commands that changes spaces to fixed spaces in math mode.
> I just wanted to be sure that @w
On 2022-10-15 11:26:06 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > In your use case, you can avoid line breaks using the @w command:
> > >
> > > @deftypefun int f4 ()
> > > @w{@math{@var{n} = -2}}.
> > > @end deftypefun
> >
> > If the @w
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > In your use case, you can avoid line breaks using the @w command:
> >
> > @deftypefun int f4 ()
> > @w{@math{@var{n} = -2}}.
> > @end deftypefun
>
> If the @w ignored in math mode?
No, the contents of @w are not split across
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-10-14 21:42:27 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
[...]
In your use case, you can avoid line breaks using the @w command:
@deftypefun int f4 ()
@w{@math{@var{n} = -2}}.
@end deftypefun
If the @w ignored in math mode?
[...]
For PDF output, I want the spaces to
On 2022-10-14 21:42:27 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > FYI, the goal is to have @ttie{} equivalent to @tie{} except for
> > PDF output (where @tie{} also gives incorrect spacing).
>
> I see. As ever, using Texinfo commands inside
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> \input texinfo@c -*-texinfo-*-
>
> @macro ttie {}
> @end macro
>
> @deftypefun int f1 ()
> @math{@var{n}=-2}.
> @end deftypefun
>
> @deftypefun int f2 ()
>
On 2022-10-14 06:56:13 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:20:24PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > is not true. More precisely, I would expect
> >
> > @macro ttie
> > @end macro
> >
> > to generate nothing, but inserting @ttie{} in a TeX expression
> > modifies the spacing
17 matches
Mail list logo
