Thanks Gavin,
> Done in SVN revision 7041. Please email if there are further problems.
I have prepared a new version for Debian and asked the ess team
to see if that works out. We will surely come back if there
are any problems.
Thanks a big big many times for your great support!!!
Norbert
On 4 March 2016 at 21:28, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 04:01, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> The output is:
>> ./bla.texi:9: Argument of @gobblespaces has an extra }.
>
> I got the same. I think it's easy enough to fix. The only possible
>
Just a quick 'thumbs up' from here -- it is actually quite remarkable that we
do maintain buildability of these pieces over so many years and decaded, and
I really appreciate how we're going calmly about the business of maintaining
that tradition.
Thanks to Norbert for distilling that minimal
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
>> > I have reduced the problematic case to the following minimal example:
>
> Thank you for taking the time to do this, Norbert.
>
>> From these two facts I'd declare that the new texinfo.tex that
>> you have in
> > I have reduced the problematic case to the following minimal example:
Thank you for taking the time to do this, Norbert.
> From these two facts I'd declare that the new texinfo.tex that
> you have in Debian is broken.
> (Yes, that is a strong statement; but still breaking something
>
On 4 March 2016 at 04:01, Norbert Preining wrote:
> The output is:
> ./bla.texi:9: Argument of @gobblespaces has an extra }.
I got the same. I think it's easy enough to fix. The only possible
problem is that this error comes about due to an attempt to remove
whitespace
> Norbert Preining
> on Fri, 4 Mar 2016 13:01:23 +0900 writes:
> Dear all,
> down here at Debian we got another bug report about a FTBFS, which
> went away when switching to an older version of texinfo.tex:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2016, Dirk
Dear all,
down here at Debian we got another bug report about a FTBFS, which
went away when switching to an older version of texinfo.tex:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Ok, the obvious fix of fattening the source directory with a working copy of
> texinfo.tex did the trick.
I