Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

2016-10-01 Thread Tim Rühsen
On Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016 20:27:47 CEST Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Tim Rühsen > > Cc: ge...@mweb.co.za > > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:10:26 +0200 > > > > > > It shouldn't be too hard to write a script that cross-compiles wget > > > > and > > > > some dependencies via

Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

2016-10-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Tim Rühsen > Cc: ge...@mweb.co.za > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:10:26 +0200 > > > > It shouldn't be too hard to write a script that cross-compiles wget and > > > some dependencies via mingw. But would such an .exe really work on a real > > > Windows machine ? > > > >

Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

2016-10-01 Thread Tim Rühsen
On Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016 18:29:30 CEST Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Tim Rühsen > > Cc: "ge...@mweb.co.za" > > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 13:04:25 +0200 > > > > It shouldn't be too hard to write a script that cross-compiles wget and > > some dependencies

Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

2016-10-01 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Tim Rühsen > Cc: "ge...@mweb.co.za" > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 13:04:25 +0200 > > It shouldn't be too hard to write a script that cross-compiles wget and some > dependencies via mingw. But would such an .exe really work on a real Windows > machine ?

Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

2016-10-01 Thread Tim Rühsen
On Freitag, 30. September 2016 19:17:42 CEST Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:52:55 +0200 (SAST) > > From: "ge...@mweb.co.za" > > > > So, is there a "secret" new place hosting a newer version for Windows? Or > > is the 1.11 on sourceforge actually okay? And -