On 12/17/19 5:08 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>
>> wget has no parallel processing. Wget2 has.
>
> This phrasing could use some clarity.
>
> Does this mean that Wget2 is not Wget? Is 'Wget2' the name of a separate
> tool/project?
>
> Or is Wget2 actually
Hi,
El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 16:36, Petr Pisar ()
escribió:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Álvaro Pinel Bueno wrote:
> > El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 15:36, Tim Rühsen ()
> > escribió:
> >
> > > are you sure that " and * are not somehow removed / expanded ?
> > >
> > > To test,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Tim Rühsen wrote:
wget has no parallel processing. Wget2 has.
This phrasing could use some clarity.
Does this mean that Wget2 is not Wget? Is 'Wget2' the name of a separate
tool/project?
Or is Wget2 actually Wget version 2? Because if it is, then Wget has parallel
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Álvaro Pinel Bueno wrote:
> El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 15:36, Tim Rühsen ()
> escribió:
>
> > are you sure that " and * are not somehow removed / expanded ?
> >
> > To test, put the wget command into a shell script and start that script
> > in the
Hi,
El mar., 17 dic. 2019 a las 15:36, Tim Rühsen ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> are you sure that " and * are not somehow removed / expanded ?
>
> To test, put the wget command into a shell script and start that script
> in the crontab. Does this make a difference ?
>
Yes, I fact I realized this
Hi,
are you sure that " and * are not somehow removed / expanded ?
To test, put the wget command into a shell script and start that script
in the crontab. Does this make a difference ?
Regards, Tim
On 12/17/19 2:55 PM, Álvaro Pinel Bueno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I realized using wget secheduled in
Hello,
I realized using wget secheduled in cron always ask to my dns
server local-hostname resolution.
If I try in bash it doesn't happen but in root cron I receive in my dns
server at first the resolution of the hostname of the host with the cron
scheduled and after the resolution of the domain
Hi Michel,
wget has no parallel processing. Wget2 has.
Regards, Tim
On 12/17/19 12:56 PM, michel.kempene...@telenet.be wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> It seems completely logical that Wget --- or any application for that matter
> --- works through an input list sequentially.
> But the resulting order
Hi Tim,
It seems completely logical that Wget --- or any application for that matter
--- works through an input list sequentially.
But the resulting order might depend upon whether Wget only handles a single
file at a time, or whether it is capable of processing several files in
parallel.
I
