Am Monday 10 December 2012 schrieb Micah Cowan:
On 12/09/2012 02:45 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012 schrieb 7382...@gmail.com:
Hello
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate).
It would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and
On 12/09/2012 04:11 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
7382...@gmail.com writes:
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate). It
would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and use less of
their bandwidth. Is it okay to add this idea to the
On 12/09/2012 02:45 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012 schrieb 7382...@gmail.com:
Hello
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate). It
would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and use less of
their bandwidth. Is it okay to add this
Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012 schrieb 7382...@gmail.com:
Hello
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate). It
would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and use less of
their bandwidth. Is it okay to add this idea to the
7382...@gmail.com writes:
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate). It
would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and use less of
their bandwidth. Is it okay to add this idea to the
http://wget.addictivecode.org/FeatureSpecifications page?
I don't
Hello
I think wget should HTTP compression (Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate). It
would put less strain on servers being downloading from, and use less of
their bandwidth. Is it okay to add this idea to the
http://wget.addictivecode.org/FeatureSpecifications page? I don't know
where on the page to
