> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:44:02 +0100
> From: "Andries E. Brouwer"
> Cc: "Andries E. Brouwer" , tim.rueh...@gmx.de,
> bug-wget@gnu.org, lifenjoi...@163.com
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Fonts
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Fonts indeed can affect the visual width, but if we assume that the
> terminal font is a fixed-pitch one, that problem is much less
> significant, IME.
Experience shows that one may get a single-width replacement symbol
when the
On Friday, February 17, 2017 12:11:54 AM CET YX Hao wrote:
> Dear Tim,
>
>
>
> I think you may misunderstand my situation or just starting to reproduce the
> issue.
>
> My configuration result is NO NLS support, that means 'USE_NLS_PROGRESS_BAR'
> is undefined.
Hi YX Hao,
@Andries please
Dear Tim,
I think you may misunderstand my situation or just starting to reproduce the
issue.
My configuration result is NO NLS support, that means 'USE_NLS_PROGRESS_BAR'
is undefined.
I guess screenshot is necessary at this time.
And it will always fall to the 'else' case of
Hi Guys,
The algorithm to locate the string sequence, which is for scrolling long
file name in the downloading progress animation, is hard ;p
The only problem is the 'cols_to_bytes' function for no NLS feature, which
returns wrong bytes number should be copied! I guess.
Will some body take a
Hi there,
My configuration is without NLS feature, and got the bug with extra copying
over the file name end, when the leftover length of the file name is less
than the preset displaying length. And, with the ending '\0', the left part
of the progress image won't be printed and updated.