Re: [Bug-wget] [GSoC] Refactoring the Test Suite

2014-06-09 Thread Zihang Chen
Thank you both, Darshit and Giuseppe, for paying attention and guiding me about the patch series. I'm very grateful. 2014-06-07 22:44 GMT+08:00 Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org: Darshit Shah dar...@gmail.com writes: With Zihang's copyright assignment process over, is there anything

[Bug-wget] RFC 2616 is dead

2014-06-09 Thread Daniel Stenberg
Hey friends Just a FYI: HTTP 1.1 now has a new set of specs, see RFC7230 to RFC7235. The trusted and old 2616 is now obsolete... http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233

Re: [Bug-wget] RFC 2616 is dead

2014-06-09 Thread Darshit Shah
Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for the heads up. I've been going theough the updated documents and am liking some of the changes so far. RFC 7230-5 seem like a more stable set of specifications. I'm looking forward to clean some of the code from Wget. However, what do you think about its adoption? Will

Re: [Bug-wget] Contribute to New Wget Test Suite.

2014-06-09 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Hi Sagar! Sagar sagar.srivastava4...@gmail.com writes: Hello,all! I'm Sagar,from India currently pursuing B.E in Computer Sc. from BITS Pilani. New to the open source community,I'm eager to contribute. I've been learning Python for quite some time, and i'm quite comfortable with it. I

[Bug-wget] [Bug-Wget] Update VMS Info?

2014-06-09 Thread Darshit Shah
Hi, I was going through the VMS specific files in the source and realized that a lot of the documentation seems to be a little outdated. For example the WGET.HLP file still refers to Wget 1.12 as the latest version and explains everything based on it. Maybe it can be updated by whoever is