Thank you both, Darshit and Giuseppe, for paying attention and guiding me
about the patch series. I'm very grateful.
2014-06-07 22:44 GMT+08:00 Giuseppe Scrivano gscriv...@gnu.org:
Darshit Shah dar...@gmail.com writes:
With Zihang's copyright assignment process over, is there anything
Hey friends
Just a FYI: HTTP 1.1 now has a new set of specs, see RFC7230 to RFC7235. The
trusted and old 2616 is now obsolete...
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233
Hi Daniel,
Thanks a lot for the heads up. I've been going theough the updated
documents and am liking some of the changes so far.
RFC 7230-5 seem like a more stable set of specifications. I'm looking
forward to clean some of the code from Wget.
However, what do you think about its adoption? Will
Hi Sagar!
Sagar sagar.srivastava4...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,all!
I'm Sagar,from India currently pursuing B.E in Computer Sc. from BITS
Pilani.
New to the open source community,I'm eager to contribute.
I've been learning Python for quite some time, and i'm quite
comfortable with it.
I
Hi,
I was going through the VMS specific files in the source and realized
that a lot of the documentation seems to be a little outdated.
For example the WGET.HLP file still refers to Wget 1.12 as the latest
version and explains everything based on it. Maybe it can be updated
by whoever is