--
*Witchakorn Kamolpornwijit*
MIT Class of 2016
Blog: http://chalet16.com
Portfolio: http://www6.portfolio.chalet16.com
Facebook/Twitter/IRC: chalet16
Skype: chalet1601
0001-Fix-range-check-in-map_html_tags.patch
Description: Binary data
grown testing one)
http://fly.osdn.org.ua/~mike/iso/tmp/live-flightgear-20141101-x86_64.iso
Second run resulted in 1002020 bytes downloaded with the same failure.
--
WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org
-- http://opennet.ru / http://anna-news.info
On 11/01, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Darshit Shah writes:
From 1a29f21bb24c531f450dd59446a0c5a0f7e81110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Darshit Shah
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 05:34:04 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Remove extra padding from the progress bar
---
src/ChangeLog | 7 +++
src/progress.c |
On 11/01, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Hi Darshit,
Darshit Shah writes:
On 11/01, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Darshit Shah writes:
On 10/31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Oct 2014 16:50, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
> Newer versions of these packages ship with pkg-config file
Hi Darshit,
Darshit Shah writes:
> On 11/01, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>>Darshit Shah writes:
>>
>>> On 10/31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Oct 2014 16:50, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > Newer versions of these packages ship with pkg-config files, so if we
>>>
Darshit Shah writes:
> From 1a29f21bb24c531f450dd59446a0c5a0f7e81110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Darshit Shah
> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 05:34:04 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] Remove extra padding from the progress bar
>
> ---
> src/ChangeLog | 7 +++
> src/progress.c | 7 ++-
> 2 files c
Mike Frysinger writes:
> On 01 Nov 2014 14:05, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 05:43:11 schrieb Darshit Shah:
>> > In the last few days we've seen a huge flurry of activity and a large
>> > number
>> > of patches have been committed to the code base. As someone who was
>> > tr
On 11/01, Pär Karlsson wrote:
Sorry, my bad. :-/ Amended in new patch attached.
Pushed. Thanks for the contribution!
--
Thanking You,
Darshit Shah
pgpvS1LXupKcE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 11/01, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Darshit Shah writes:
On 10/31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Oct 2014 16:50, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
> Newer versions of these packages ship with pkg-config files, so if we can
> detect it via those, do so. If that fails, fall back t
Darshit Shah writes:
> On 10/31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>On 31 Oct 2014 16:50, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger writes:
>>> > Newer versions of these packages ship with pkg-config files, so if we can
>>> > detect it via those, do so. If that fails, fall back to the old methods.
>>>
>
Darshit Shah wrote:
On 11/01, taras.malivanc...@totaldefense.com wrote:
a case, what would be the expected outcome? Should Wget delete the
larger file? Or retain it?
It should delete partial file.The full file must not be downloaded ,
the download will stop when downloaded stuff reaches limi
On 01 Nov 2014 14:11, Darshit Shah wrote:
> If we're to merge these patches, all of them should be squashed into one
> since
> they all perform the same action. I've merged all the patches into a single
> one
> and added ChangeLog entry to its right place. If others agree, I'll push this
> pat
On 01 Nov 2014 14:05, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 05:43:11 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> > In the last few days we've seen a huge flurry of activity and a large number
> > of patches have been committed to the code base. As someone who was
> > traveling and hence unable to keep up w
On 11/01, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 05:43:11 schrieb Darshit Shah:
Hi,
In the last few days we've seen a huge flurry of activity and a large number
of patches have been committed to the code base. As someone who was
traveling and hence unable to keep up with the mailing li
On 11/01, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 14:11:53 schrieb Darshit Shah:
I'm in favour of using pkg-config for detection of these libraries and would
like to see the manual checking code gone in a future release.
If we're to merge these patches, all of them should be squashed in
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014, Tim Rühsen wrote:
If we move to detailed commit messages (I would appreciate it), then we
should autogenerate ChangeLog files from the commit messages. You will find
many projects out there already doing so.
I would strongly support this as well.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 14:11:53 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> I'm in favour of using pkg-config for detection of these libraries and would
> like to see the manual checking code gone in a future release.
>
> If we're to merge these patches, all of them should be squashed into one
> since they all
Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 05:43:11 schrieb Darshit Shah:
> Hi,
>
> In the last few days we've seen a huge flurry of activity and a large number
> of patches have been committed to the code base. As someone who was
> traveling and hence unable to keep up with the mailing lists, I tried to
> cat
Darshit Shah writes:
> On 10/31, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>>Darshit Shah writes:
>>
>>> Ever since the Perl tests have been ported to the parallel test
>>> harness, Test-proxied-https-auth.px has always failed for me. In a
>>> prior thread, we'd identified the problem as a race between the HTTPS
Sorry, my bad. :-/ Amended in new patch attached.
/Pär
2014-11-01 7:00 GMT+01:00 Darshit Shah :
> On 11/01, Darshit Shah wrote:
>
>> On 10/31, Pär Karlsson wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the tips, I was going crazy trying to make git to send the
>>> emails via git send-email, and it just ended up weir
I'm in favour of using pkg-config for detection of these libraries and would
like to see the manual checking code gone in a future release.
If we're to merge these patches, all of them should be squashed into one since
they all perform the same action. I've merged all the patches into a single
21 matches
Mail list logo
