Re: [Bug-wget] Timestamping vs incomplete downloads

2018-10-23 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 10/23/18 9:07 AM, Darshit Shah wrote: > On October 22, 2018 11:49:12 PM UTC, Dave Warren wrote: >> Currently when a download with timestamping enabled gets interrupted, >> the timestamp of the resulting file ends up being the current time and >> when wget is re-executed after connectivity is

Re: [Bug-wget] Timestamping vs incomplete downloads

2018-10-23 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 10/23/18 9:07 AM, Darshit Shah wrote: > On October 22, 2018 11:49:12 PM UTC, Dave Warren wrote: >> Currently when a download with timestamping enabled gets interrupted, >> the timestamp of the resulting file ends up being the current time and >> when wget is re-executed after connectivity is

Re: [Bug-wget] Timestamping vs incomplete downloads

2018-10-23 Thread Darshit Shah
On October 22, 2018 11:49:12 PM UTC, Dave Warren wrote: >Currently when a download with timestamping enabled gets interrupted, >the timestamp of the resulting file ends up being the current time and >when wget is re-executed after connectivity is restored the local file >is then seen as newer a

[Bug-wget] Timestamping vs incomplete downloads

2018-10-22 Thread Dave Warren
Currently when a download with timestamping enabled gets interrupted, the timestamp of the resulting file ends up being the current time and when wget is re-executed after connectivity is restored the local file is then seen as newer and skipped. robocopy handles this a little differently, by