Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-18 Thread Josef Moellers
On 18.09.2017 16:48, Tim Rühsen wrote: > Hi Josef, > > pushed your patch - thanks for your contribution. Welcome > BTW, the example from your original post doesn't show that wrong server > behavior any more. Maybe the server got fixed meanwhile !? I guess so. Probably a glitch. That's why I

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-18 Thread Tim Rühsen
Hi Josef, pushed your patch - thanks for your contribution. BTW, the example from your original post doesn't show that wrong server behavior any more. Maybe the server got fixed meanwhile !? With Best Regards, Tim On 09/14/2017 07:47 PM, Josef Moellers wrote: > On 14.09.2017 17:06, Tim

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-15 Thread Josef Moellers
On 15.09.2017 09:34, Josef Moellers wrote: > On 14.09.2017 17:06, Tim Rühsen wrote: >> On 09/14/2017 12:11 PM, Josef Moellers wrote: >>> On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: > Hi, > > We have seen (at least) one server who has >

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-15 Thread Josef Moellers
On 14.09.2017 17:06, Tim Rühsen wrote: > On 09/14/2017 12:11 PM, Josef Moellers wrote: >> On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: >>> On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: Hi, We have seen (at least) one server who has Accept-Ranges: bytes in his header but, upon

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-14 Thread Josef Moellers
On 14.09.2017 17:06, Tim Rühsen wrote: > On 09/14/2017 12:11 PM, Josef Moellers wrote: >> On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: >>> On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: Hi, We have seen (at least) one server who has Accept-Ranges: bytes in his header but, upon

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-14 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 09/14/2017 12:11 PM, Josef Moellers wrote: > On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: >> On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have seen (at least) one server who has >>> Accept-Ranges: bytes >>> in his header but, upon receiving a request with >>> Range:

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-14 Thread Josef Moellers
On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: > On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have seen (at least) one server who has >> Accept-Ranges: bytes >> in his header but, upon receiving a request with >> Range: bytes=23068672- >> responds with >> HTTP/1.1 416 Requested Range Not

Re: [Bug-wget] http server responding with 416 but file was not transferred completely

2017-09-14 Thread Josef Moellers
On 14.09.2017 10:12, Tim Rühsen wrote: > On 09/14/2017 09:53 AM, Josef Moellers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have seen (at least) one server who has >> Accept-Ranges: bytes >> in his header but, upon receiving a request with >> Range: bytes=23068672- >> responds with >> HTTP/1.1 416 Requested Range Not