[Bug-wget] [PATCH v2] bug #45790: wget prints it's progress even when background

Hi, Reworked recent patch to behave correctly on fg and bg. Now user can switch from fg to bg and vice versa and wget will select fd accordingly. Please review. Thanks Piotr --- src/log.c | 116 +++-- src/log.h | 1 + src/main.c |

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH v2] bug #45790: wget prints it's progress even when background

> From: Piotr Wajda > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:51:37 +0200 > > Hi, Reworked recent patch to behave correctly on fg and bg. Now user can > switch from fg to bg and vice versa and wget will select fd accordingly. Thanks. > + /* Initialize this values so we don't have to

Re: [Bug-wget] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GNU Wget

while ((n = FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN (p)) > 0) in two places should silence them all four. On Friday, September 30, 2016 11:56:41 AM CEST Darshit Shah wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: 30 September 2016 at 11:42 > Subject: New Defects

[Bug-wget] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GNU Wget

-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: 30 September 2016 at 11:42 Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GNU Wget To: dar...@gmail.com Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to GNU Wget found with Coverity Scan. 4 new

Re: [Bug-wget] Digest Authentication Support in wget

Hi, I'm not sure what exactly you're looking for. For HTTP authentication, Wget supports both Basic and Digest Authentication. However, for proxy authentication, Wget currently supports only basic authentication. We would however be glad to accept a patch for digest authentication on

[Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

Hi guys, I just checked, I believe the version of wget I am running is from 2003 (and I have been using it for much mich longer than that ...) At some point I even wrote scripts around wget batch jobs I used to run ... But I am kind of stuck in Windows. And things happen on a different time

Re: [Bug-wget] wget for windows - current build?

> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:52:55 +0200 (SAST) > From: "ge...@mweb.co.za" > > So, is there a "secret" new place hosting a newer version for Windows? Or is > the 1.11 on sourceforge actually okay? And - while I am already asking all > these stupid questions - would that

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 21/27] New option --metalink-index to process Metalink application/metalink4+xml

Hi, On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:03:01 +0200 Matthew White wrote: > + while ((n = FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN (p))) > +p += n; Fix attached to silence Coverity's false positive. Thanks to Tim Ruehsen and Darshit Shah:

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 11/27] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary

Hi, On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:02:51 +0200 Matthew White wrote: > + while ((n = FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN (basename))) > +basename += n; Fix attached to silence Coverity's false positive. Thanks to Tim Ruehsen and Darshit Shah: