Re: [Bug-wget] make.exe warnings

2018-04-06 Thread Darshit Shah
All of these warnings happen due to gnulib replacing standard Unix API calls 
with replacements for system specific implementations.

I guess that removing the warnings for redefinition definitely makes sense in 
the gnulib code.  Redefining functions is quite literally its job.

The pointer type warnings, I would want to look at them once and decide whether 
to fix or silence them

On April 6, 2018 7:39:30 AM UTC, "Tim Rühsen"  wrote:
>On 04/06/2018 04:30 AM, Jeffrey Fetterman wrote:
>> I've successfully built wget2 through msys2 as a Windows binary, and
>it
>> appears to be working (granted I've not used it much yet), but I'm
>> concerned about some of the warnings that occurred during
>compilation.
>> 
>> Unsurprisingly they seem to be socket-related.
>> 
>> https://spit.mixtape.moe/view/9f38bd83
>
>These are warnings from gnulib code. The code itself looks good to me.
>Our CFLAGS for building the gnulib code are maybe too strong, I'll see
>if reducing verbosity is recommended here.
>
>With Best Regards, Tim

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Re: [Bug-wget] make.exe warnings

2018-04-06 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 04/06/2018 04:30 AM, Jeffrey Fetterman wrote:
> I've successfully built wget2 through msys2 as a Windows binary, and it
> appears to be working (granted I've not used it much yet), but I'm
> concerned about some of the warnings that occurred during compilation.
> 
> Unsurprisingly they seem to be socket-related.
> 
> https://spit.mixtape.moe/view/9f38bd83

These are warnings from gnulib code. The code itself looks good to me.
Our CFLAGS for building the gnulib code are maybe too strong, I'll see
if reducing verbosity is recommended here.

With Best Regards, Tim



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature