https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35784|Diff from v11 to v12|Incremental patch from v11
descri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
--- Comment #57 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 35784
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35784&action=edit
Diff from v11 to v12
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35738|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
Bernard Spil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|support |APR-util
Version|2.5-HEAD
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #8 from Bernard Spil ---
(In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35782 [details]
> Output of make -dl configure
>
> Using `script`
> Should capture all command output for invocation of configure
And there i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Jung ---
(In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #6)
> (In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 35782 [details]
> > Output of make -dl configure
> >
> > Using `script`
> > Should capture all c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #6 from Bernard Spil ---
(In reply to Bernard Spil from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35782 [details]
> Output of make -dl configure
>
> Using `script`
> Should capture all command output for invocation of configure
And there i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #5 from Bernard Spil ---
Created attachment 35782
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35782&action=edit
Output of make -dl configure
Using `script`
Should capture all command output for invocation of configure
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung ---
Look for the occurence of -L/usr/lib in the files in the build directory (after
configure) in config.log (main directory, but also in srclib/ap* in case you
use bundled apr/apu and in configure output. You ca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #3 from Bernard Spil ---
Looks like I have to fix this myself(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #2)
> Note that the change you cited was already part of 2.4.32. Looking at the
> small diff between 2.4.32 and 2.4.33 I do not see a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung ---
Note that the change you cited was already part of 2.4.32. Looking at the small
diff between 2.4.32 and 2.4.33 I do not see anything that changes the build
system. This would also not be expected.
Concerning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #1 from Bernard Spil ---
Caused by r1823624
And by providing LDFLAGS to configure
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector -L/usr/lib
-L/usr/local/lib
Looks like I have to fix this myself
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
Bug ID: 62188
Summary: Link error for support/ab when --with-openssl is not
base OpenSSL
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: FreeBS
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
14 matches
Mail list logo