[Bug 66282] mod_proxy_https adds "Content-Encoding: chunked" to requests that have no body

2022-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66282 Stefan Eissing changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Stefan

[Bug 64537] ProxyPassMatch with mod_proxy_ajp ignores AJP secret

2022-09-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537 --- Comment #9 from Cedric Roijakkers --- Version 2.4.54 is what I tried with, that got me fooled by looking into this issue again. To be more precise, I based my container on top of docker container httpd:2.4.54-alpine3.16. The full httpd -V

[Bug 64537] ProxyPassMatch with mod_proxy_ajp ignores AJP secret

2022-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 66282] New: mod_proxy_https adds "Content-Encoding: chunked" to requests that have no body

2022-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66282 Bug ID: 66282 Summary: mod_proxy_https adds "Content-Encoding: chunked" to requests that have no body Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.53 Ha

[Bug 64537] ProxyPassMatch with mod_proxy_ajp ignores AJP secret

2022-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537 --- Comment #7 from Cedric Roijakkers --- It's been over a year since my last comment in this thread. We've been running in production with the patch supplied in this bug, everything is working fine. The latest httpd release is now 2.4.54

[Bug 66280] New: ap_uname2id() / ap_gname2id() disregard errno (esp. EINTR) from getpwnam() / getgrnam()

2022-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280 Bug ID: 66280 Summary: ap_uname2id() / ap_gname2id() disregard errno (esp. EINTR) from getpwnam() / getgrnam() Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC

[Bug 66274] I need to add Total column as shown below. So far my code looks like this. What is the best way to archive that?

2022-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66274 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Status|NEW

[Bug 66273] Traffic is halted in apache when one of the worker network connection is down

2022-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273 --- Comment #2 from MDReddy --- Update : Performed the same test with connectiontimeout=5 and results are little different compare to above mentioned. There was no halt seen but no of requests sent to other node is very limited. Throughput

[Bug 66274] New: I need to add Total column as shown below. So far my code looks like this. What is the best way to archive that?

2022-09-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66274 Bug ID: 66274 Summary: I need to add Total column as shown below. So far my code looks like this. What is the best way to archive that? Product: Apache httpd-2

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/09/25]

2022-09-25 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66273] Traffic is halted in apache when one of the worker network connection is down

2022-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273 MDReddy changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from MDReddy

[Bug 66273] New: Traffic is halted in apache when one of the worker network connection is down

2022-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273 Bug ID: 66273 Summary: Traffic is halted in apache when one of the worker network connection is down Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.34 Hardware: PC

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/09/18]

2022-09-18 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66267] mod_rewrite returns 403 when a directory with the same name as RewriteRule exists in server's root directory

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267 Sato Kenta changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66267] mod_rewrite returns 403 when a directory with the same name as RewriteRule exists in server's root directory

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Eric Covener

[Bug 66267] New: mod_rewrite returns 403 when a directory with the same name as RewriteRule exists in server's root directory

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267 Bug ID: 66267 Summary: mod_rewrite returns 403 when a directory with the same name as RewriteRule exists in server's root directory Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.51

[Bug 66256] connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #5 from Eric Covener --- (In reply to pushakk from comment #4) > Hello, > > but, in this link it say > > Valor por defecto:LimitRequestBody 0 > > and 0 is unlimited. Looks like an out of date trans

[Bug 66256] connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #4 from pushakk --- Hello, but, in this link it say Valor por defecto: LimitRequestBody 0 and 0 is unlimited. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66256] connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #3 from Eric Covener --- The default was recently changed. But the manual looks correct here: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#limitrequestbody -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 66256] connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 pushakk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CLOSED Status|NEW

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/09/11]

2022-09-11 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66256] connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 --- Comment #1 from pushakk --- I have changed some reqtimeout mod params without results. Disable this mod does not work neither. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66256] New: connection reset uploading large files

2022-09-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 Bug ID: 66256 Summary: connection reset uploading large files Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 62349] Adding ProxyHTMLLinks directive leads to "malformed" / "corrupt" response (potentially due to proxying to HTTPS location?)

2022-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349 --- Comment #2 from benjamin.demart...@liege.be --- I can confirm, a bit more googling showed me the answer: Either you register the proxy-html filter manually in between INFLATE and DEFLATE using `SetOutputFilter INFLATE;xml2enc;proxy-html

[Bug 62349] Adding ProxyHTMLLinks directive leads to "malformed" / "corrupt" response (potentially due to proxying to HTTPS location?)

2022-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349 benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benjamin.demart

[Bug 62349] Adding ProxyHTMLLinks directive leads to "malformed" / "corrupt" response (potentially due to proxying to HTTPS location?)

2022-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349 benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.4.33 |2.4.37 -- You

[Bug 60439] Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

2022-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60439 benjamin.demart...@liege.be changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.4.25 |2.4.37 -- You

[Bug 62349] Adding ProxyHTMLLinks directive leads to "malformed" / "corrupt" response (potentially due to proxying to HTTPS location?)

2022-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62349 --- Comment #1 from benjamin.demart...@liege.be --- I'm encountering this as well, only when proxying a request with content-encoding set. My guess is that mod_proxy_html is executed at the wrong time and executing either before proxied request

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 --- Comment #7 from max --- so it is too bother so i think it can add option to control log file suffix when with -n option can save log file with x.1.log x.2.log thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 --- Comment #6 from Eric Covener --- (In reply to max from comment #5) > while true; do echo 123; done | rotatelogs -n2 1.%Y-%m-%d-%H_%M_%S.log 1k > Cannot use -n with % in filename > > > if not append -n2, it will ge

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 --- Comment #5 from max --- while true; do echo 123; done | rotatelogs -n2 1.%Y-%m-%d-%H_%M_%S.log 1k Cannot use -n with % in filename if not append -n2, it will gen many log file how to make a limit of number of file -- You

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 --- Comment #4 from Eric Covener --- Whoops, never pasted: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/rotatelogs.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #3 from Eric Covener

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 --- Comment #2 from max --- i want save log with 50M per file, and two file for rotate. total 100m space is there a good method to gen log file xx.1.log xx.2.log or xx.2022-xxx(date).log -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 66253] rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Status|NEW

[Bug 66253] New: rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify

2022-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253 Bug ID: 66253 Summary: rotatelogs -n option log file suffix can't modify Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/09/04]

2022-09-04 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 64919] mod_proxy_fcgi fails to parse headers with a string length over 8192

2022-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919 maikhu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maikhu...@gmail.com -- You

[Bug 66004] Child processes disappears one by one with no web access.

2022-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004 --- Comment #22 from rtnf...@gmail.com --- Mentioned in : https://operations.osmfoundation.org/2022/07/24/standard-tile-layer.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #6 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> --- Going further; attempting to use the presence of my new env-var SSI_INCLUDE_LEVEL >= 1 to trigger the nested path in includes_filter() causes a SIGSEGV because r->main is always NU

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #5 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> --- Vital typo in previous comment (put level1-A4.html twice)! * includes_filter() r=0x7fc5f45150a0 r->request_config=0x7fc5f4516388 parent=0x0 In handle_include() the 'rr' values ch

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #4 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> --- With some further debug messages I've identified the cause but not the solution! All calls to includes_filter() have the same, original request_rec address - including the sub-requests so '

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #3 from Eric Covener --- > the sub-requests for the nested #include statements get a new request_rec so > the following code never triggers: I think on the surface it is anticipating that a new request_rec will be used an

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #2 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> --- Created attachment 38378 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38378=edit Test case HTML files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee fo

[Bug 66243] Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 --- Comment #1 from Tj <0.apa...@iam.tj> --- Created attachment 38377 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38377=edit WIP + debug messaging This is the current WIP I'm using to explore the issue. There are two compil

[Bug 66243] New: Nested #include not detected / path not taken

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243 Bug ID: 66243 Summary: Nested #include not detected / path not taken Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/08/28]

2022-08-28 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66241] Apache server automatically restarting while getting multiple requests

2022-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OS

[Bug 66241] New: Apache server automatically restarting while getting multiple requests

2022-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241 Bug ID: 66241 Summary: Apache server automatically restarting while getting multiple requests Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.10 Hardware: PC Status

[Bug 66214] Huge memory utilization after upgrade from 2.3.39 to 2.4.54

2022-08-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 engrand changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #2 from engrand --- Did

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/08/21]

2022-08-21 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66225] Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_renegotiate()

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225 --- Comment #1 from UVScan --- If httpd does not check the return value of SSL_renegotiate(), it could cause a DoS attack. Since SSL renegotiation process needs many computing resources and the current httpd does not break the renegotiation

[Bug 66228] Apache fails to start with "(38)Function not implemented: AH00141: Could not initialize random number generator"

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66228 --- Comment #1 from frederic.li...@free.fr --- The problem seems to be my kernel version which is 3.14 # uname -r 3.14.32--grs-ipv6-64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66228] New: Apache fails to start with "(38)Function not implemented: AH00141: Could not initialize random number generator"

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66228 Bug ID: 66228 Summary: Apache fails to start with "(38)Function not implemented: AH00141: Could not initialize random number generator" Product: Apac

[Bug 28656] consecutive ssh commands from a CGI timeout

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656 --- Comment #8 from ayushi --- Thanks for sharing this Infomational and helpfull post. https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/3520-twin-steering;>Ashok Leyland 3520 Twin Steering -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 66224] Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_peek()

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224 UVScan changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 66226] New: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context()

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66226 Bug ID: 66226 Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context() Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS

[Bug 66225] New: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_renegotiate()

2022-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66225 Bug ID: 66225 Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_renegotiate() Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1

[Bug 66224] New: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_peek()

2022-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224 Bug ID: 66224 Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_peek() Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW

[Bug 66223] Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_do_handshake()

2022-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 UVScan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.zhao1...@gmail.com -- You

[Bug 66223] New: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_do_handshake()

2022-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223 Bug ID: 66223 Summary: Lacking a check for the return value of SSL_do_handshake() Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X

[Bug 28656] consecutive ssh commands from a CGI timeout

2022-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656 --- Comment #9 from ayushi --- Best blog https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/3520-twin-steering https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck/4220 https://trucks.tractorjunction.com/en/ashok-leyland-truck

[Bug 28656] consecutive ssh commands from a CGI timeout

2022-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28656 ayushi changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://trucks.tractorjunct

[Bug 66219] Apache 2.4.4.3 version having latency issues on RHEL7

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219 --- Comment #2 from Eric Covener --- (In reply to Michael W Johnson from comment #1) > Does Apache offer any support for Apache 2.4.4.3 on any RHEL version? Any help is best-effort from volunteers. https://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html

[Bug 66219] Apache 2.4.4.3 version having latency issues on RHEL7

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219 --- Comment #1 from Michael W Johnson --- Does Apache offer any support for Apache 2.4.4.3 on any RHEL version? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #13 from Aleksandr --- Thank you so much, that's the plan at the moment - to run apache under some ulimit restrictions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66219] New: Apache 2.4.4.3 version having latency issues on RHEL7

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66219 Bug ID: 66219 Summary: Apache 2.4.4.3 version having latency issues on RHEL7 Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.5-HEAD Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 64462] [Feature Request] Support for HTTP/3

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jfh...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 66218] Please add support for HTTP/3

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #12 from Eric Covener --- (In reply to Aleksandr from comment #10) > Sorry. Let me explain the problem deeper. Documentation says: > > ``` > This applies to processes forked from Apache httpd children servicin

[Bug 66218] New: Please add support for HTTP/3

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218 Bug ID: 66218 Summary: Please add support for HTTP/3 Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #11 from Aleksandr --- Again, if we're talking about 'processes forked from Apache httpd children servicing requests', in my understanding those are apache instances, running as www-data for example, not the main process which

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #10 from Aleksandr --- Sorry. Let me explain the problem deeper. Documentation says: ``` This applies to processes forked from Apache httpd children servicing requests, not the Apache httpd children themselves. This includes CGI

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #9 from Aleksandr --- Got it, what it does? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #8 from Eric Covener --- > or there is a feature that has never worked. The feature just doesn't limit how much memory mod_php can allocate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #7 from Eric Covener --- (In reply to Aleksandr from comment #4) > (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3) > > That's not how the manual describes it. I think in that case it would not > > add much to just

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #6 from Aleksandr --- (In reply to Aleksandr from comment #5) > I wonder why you resolved this ticket. The only thing that RLimitMEM calls > is this ap_unixd_set_rlimit, and I've not found any other code enforcing > t

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #5 from Aleksandr --- I wonder why you resolved this ticket. The only thing that RLimitMEM calls is this ap_unixd_set_rlimit, and I've not found any other code enforcing this limit -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #4 from Aleksandr --- (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3) > That's not how the manual describes it. I think in that case it would not > add much to just setting ulimits in the environment that starts Apache. But techn

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #2 from Aleksandr --- (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #1) > How do you run PHP? This directive only applies to things forked like CGI > scripts. If you use mod_php or proxy_fcgi, these directives do not apply. m

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 Eric Covener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Eric

[Bug 66217] RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 Aleksandr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aguidrevi...@gmail.com -- You

[Bug 66217] New: RLimitMEM doesn't work

2022-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 Bug ID: 66217 Summary: RLimitMEM doesn't work Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 66214] Huge memory utilization after upgrade from 2.3.39 to 2.4.54

2022-08-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 inf changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Linux |Windows Server 2008 R2 -- You are receiving

[Bug 66214] Huge memory utilization after upgrade from 2.3.39 to 2.4.54

2022-08-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 inf changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical --- Comment #1 from inf

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/08/14]

2022-08-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66214] New: Huge memory utilization after upgrade from 2.3.39 to 2.4.54

2022-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 Bug ID: 66214 Summary: Huge memory utilization after upgrade from 2.3.39 to 2.4.54 Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: PC OS: Linux

[Bug 66208] Get the best deals on Used Yamaha Outboard Engines for sale for sale when you shop the largest online selection at Yamahamarketplace.com. Free shipping on many items

2022-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208 yamaha outboard changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||APIBug URL

[Bug 66208] New: Get the best deals on Used Yamaha Outboard Engines for sale for sale when you shop the largest online selection at Yamahamarketplace.com. Free shipping on many items

2022-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208 Bug ID: 66208 Summary: Get the best deals on Used Yamaha Outboard Engines for sale for sale when you shop the largest online selection at Yamahamarketplace.com. Free shipping

[Bug 64462] [Feature Request] Support for HTTP/3

2022-08-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462 Fabrice Bacchella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr

[Bug 66205] New: httpd service reload/restart through "Segfault at 0" and httpd crash

2022-08-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205 Bug ID: 66205 Summary: httpd service reload/restart through "Segfault at 0" and httpd crash Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.37 Hardware: Other

[Bug 51982] ProxyPassReverse / balancer://cluster/ adds slash to redirect (really!)

2022-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982 --- Comment #11 from wycko...@trimet.org --- (In reply to cweekly from comment #10) > I don't think the backport was applied successfully in 2.2.26. That is, I > believe this issue remains unresolved in 2.2.26. (I ran into it on

[Bug 66119] Segmentation fault in libpcre when processing Location regex match for a long request path when MPM worked is used in 2.4.53+

2022-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66119 --- Comment #18 from Krystian Nowak --- Thanks for https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1902732 for those pathological patterns, Yann! When +/- will you be planning to port it to 2.4 branch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2022/08/07]

2022-08-07 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 63325] Default body_min_rate not enabled in mod_reqtimeout

2022-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325 geegirls3 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 62161] no way to ensure error log contains timezone in timestamps

2022-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62161 --- Comment #2 from Christian Lange --- Find it annoying two. Maybe it's possible to have the same configuration abilities for ErrorLogFormat and LogFormat? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66199] RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support

2022-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66199 --- Comment #3 from Neustradamus --- @jorton: Thanks for your reply! tls-exporter is missing, the RFC9266 is to add Channel Binding to TLS 1.3 and has been released few days ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 66199] RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support

2022-08-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66199 --- Comment #2 from Joe Orton --- r1620926 and r1620927 in fact. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >