https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #52 from Yann Ylavic ---
*** Bug 55433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Lubos Uhliarik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Graham Leggett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #48 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #47)
> Yes, likely scheduled for 2.4.40, missing one vote only.
> Please note that the patch has been updated to v6 to resolve some conflicts
> from unrelated changes
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #47 from Yann Ylavic ---
Yes, likely scheduled for 2.4.40, missing one vote only.
Please note that the patch has been updated to v6 to resolve some conflicts
from unrelated changes already merged in 2.4.40.
--
You are receiving th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #46 from Michael Osipov ---
I can see in Subversion that this patch has several +1 votes. Is it scheduled
for 2.4.40 then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #45 from Michael Osipov ---
OK, I have it now. For some reason the patch hunk against CHANGES and the docs
fail to apply. I have removed those hunks and the patch applied cleanly now.
Here is the output from curl:
> + curl --verbo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #44 from Yann Ylavic ---
Yes, the patch did not make it to 2.4.39 which was mainly a security release,
and this change is not really trivial.. Hopefully 2.4.40 is coming soon.
As for v5 ([0] below, just in case), I just tried to ap
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #43 from Michael Osipov ---
Just tried to apply v5 to 2.4.38 and 2.4.39 from the FreeBSD ports system. It
is incompatible along with the other patches available there:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/tree/master/www/apache2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #42 from s.bues...@babiel.com ---
You're right, the backend was faulty here, we could fix the issue there and as
soon as we did that it acutally worked with the unpatched version again. Sorry
for the noise.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #41 from Yann Ylavic ---
Everything looks fine until:
[Fri Mar 08 15:23:06.165463 2019] [proxy:error] [pid 869:tid 140678264567552]
(104)Connection reset by peer: [client 127.0.0.1:53920] AH01084: pass request
body failed to 127.0.0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #40 from s.bues...@babiel.com ---
Created attachment 36478
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36478&action=edit
apache-trace7-dumpio logfile
I added the log as attachment.
If I'm really mistaking something else f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #39 from Yann Ylavic ---
Looks like a backend error, could you please provide the error log with
LogLevel trace7 and mod_dumpio configured (DumpIoInput on, DumpIoOutput on)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #38 from s.bues...@babiel.com ---
Thanks, I tried with v4 patch as well, still recieving a 502 bad gateway after
sending a file via POST.
curl -v 'http://localhost:8080/action/forms/sprint-12/contact-page-85176' -X
POST -T /tmp/test
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #37 from Yann Ylavic ---
The latest patch is:
http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-forward_100_continue-v4.patch
What's the problem in your case?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #36 from s.bues...@babiel.com ---
We also happen to stumble accross this bug. Using Apache 2.4.38 and Tomcat
7.0.90.
Applying the patch
http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-forward_100_continue.patch
did not fix the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
s.bues...@babiel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s.bues...@babiel.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #35 from Stefan Eissing ---
I do not know about v3 exactly, but v4 addresses a side effect the change had
for the HTTP/2 protocol implementation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #34 from Michael Osipov ---
I have just noticed that v4 is available of the patch. I have removed v2 from
${FILESDIR} and added v4, recompiled and reinstalled apach24 port. It works
flawlessly as before with v2.
What did change? Do
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #33 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #32)
> Thanks Michael for the very appropriate test: first 401 which avoids the
> "100 continue" danse and thus gets forwarded with "connection: close",
> second 201
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #32 from Yann Ylavic ---
Thanks Michael for the very appropriate test: first 401 which avoids the "100
continue" danse and thus gets forwarded with "connection: close", second 201
with the full thing.
Great!
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #31 from Michael Osipov ---
Dropped patch v2 to the files directory of the FreeBSD ports, patch applied
cleanly, reinstalled 2.4.38 and ran my test:
> $ curl --verbose -X POST --upload
> $HOME/sitex-document.3305025974265279540.zi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #29 from Yann Ylavic ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #28)
> tomcat CONNECTORS-1564
Looks like it's Solr actually, but all tests are welcome.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #28 from Yann Ylavic ---
Also, testing the tomcat CONNECTORS-1564 case with the final patch ([1]) would
be very welcome ;)
[1]
http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-forward_100_continue.patch
--
You are receiving t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #27 from Yann Ylavic ---
Proposed for backport to 2.4.x (r1853409), let's see what other committers
think, notably if it's too much of a change for the stable branch. If so, this
will have to wait for next 2.6/3.0...
--
You are re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #26 from Michael Osipov ---
This also blocks CONNECTORS-1564.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #25 from Michael Osipov ---
Folks, can we please backport to 2.4.38 finally?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--- Comment #24 f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #23 from jfclere ---
Fixed according to my tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubsc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #22 from Yann Ylavic ---
Thanks for testing Michael.
Fixed in r1836648 (hopefully).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #21 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
Commit on trunk does not work for me. I will send logs privately to Yann.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk
--- Comment #20 from Yann Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #19 from jfclere ---
Created attachment 36048
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36048&action=edit
Patch for trunkthat works for me (based on Yann one)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assign
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #18 from jfclere ---
when using the web.xml and red.jsp and having
http://tomcat.apache.org/xml";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://tomcat.apache.org/xml
to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #17 from jfclere ---
Created attachment 36047
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36047&action=edit
jsp to demonstrate the issue (put it in webapps/ROOT)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #16 from jfclere ---
Created attachment 36046
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36046&action=edit
web.xml (to put in webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #14)
> Thanks Michael, at first glance the error_log is with mod_proxy_ajp, while
> attachment 34451 [details] is about mod_proxy_http (and I'd li
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #14 from Yann Ylavic ---
Thanks Michael, at first glance the error_log is with mod_proxy_ajp, while
attachment 34451 is about mod_proxy_http (and I'd like to keep the scope there
for now).
I agree that unpatched mod_proxy_http sends
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #13 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
FYI, I have tried mod_proxy_{http,ajp} and mod_jk.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #12 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
The error log has been sent privately due to sensitive data. Looking forward to
an analysis.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #10 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
Created attachment 36015
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36015&action=edit
curl(1) to Tomcat directly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #11 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
Created attachment 36016
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36016&action=edit
curl(1) to Tomcat via HTTPd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #9 from Yann Ylavic ---
Yes please do, along with the httpd error_log with LogLevel trace7.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #8 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #7)
> Sorry it's been a long time, I think we need more informations here as to
> the exact issue.
>
> What exactly isn't working with the propose
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic ---
Sorry it's been a long time, I think we need more informations here as to the
exact issue.
What exactly isn't working with the proposed patch?
Where are 100-continue or request bodies lacking or sent inappro
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shm-dmi...@yandex.ru
--- Comment #6 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
Any chance that this will be fixed? Have the very same problem from a backend
Tomcat. I guess I need to drop mod_proxy and try mod_ajp or drop Apache HTTPd
altogether for this.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #4 from Jay R. Wren ---
Yann,
I tried that patch, but I still get 503 error when expecting a 100 Continue
response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Max Lohrmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@wickenrode.com
--
You are receivi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Jim Jagielski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@apache.org
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
Jim Jagielski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jon.abour...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 34451
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34451&action=edit
Forward 100-continue (and minimize race when reusing backend connections)
I proposed this patch a while ago o
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60330
--- Comment #1 from Jay R. Wren ---
Created attachment 34438
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34438&action=edit
in the reverse proxy case, if request had Expects: 100-continue, delay writing
100 continue response until bac
55 matches
Mail list logo
