[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2021-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #11 from Cristian Duca --- Hello, Yann, I have compiled successfully apache on windows. I have implemented the changes from Comment7 for the mod_proxy_hcheck module. I can confirm that the fix from Comment7 works without any worka

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #10 from Cristian Duca --- Hello, Yann, I have tested the workaround by adding more ProxyHCTPSize. Now I am trying to compile Apahce on Windows and to test the coding changes from comment 7 without any mitigations added into the A

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #9 from Yann Ylavic --- Hi Cristian, (In reply to Cristian Duca from comment #8) > > I work with Tudor. > We already implemented that fix and it works as expected -> apache is stable > and we are not encountering any memory leaks

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #8 from Cristian Duca --- Hello Yann, I work with Tudor. We already implemented that fix and it works as expected -> apache is stable and we are not encountering any memory leaks issues. We have configured our hcinterval at 10 seco

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic --- Created attachment 37621 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37621&action=edit Avoid concurrent checks This patch resets the timestamp during the check (and prevents re-entering the check

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-12-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #6 from Tudor Tudorache --- We are running into the same issue with our current configuration. Apache develops a serious memory leak hitting over 1.2 GB if one of the JVM's are started or stopped. We were on Apache 2.4.26 previously

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #5 from Jim Jagielski --- Thanks for the incredible bug report and the excellent investigation. I agree that Fixes 1+2 make the most sense. I'll look into adding them asap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assig

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2020-10-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #4 from WJCarpenter --- I've spent quite a bit of time over the last few days trying to understand what goes on here. I have reproduced the memory growth on both Windows and Linux with Apache httpd 2.4.46. It doesn't depend on healt

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2019-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 Christophe JAILLET changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||61499 Referenced Bugs: https://

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2019-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #3 from pawel.c --- Replicable also on 39, Windows Server 2012 It is about health check memory leaks depends on frequency. To reproduce... (1) You have to have more than one high freq health check like... ProxyHCExpr wsOK {%{REQU

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2018-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #2 from CFindley --- Note: we have a very lengthy and aged httpd.conf file which has cruft from years of fixing defects and adding new options, so it is entirely possible this is some artifact of that. I did try setting up a very si

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2018-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 WJCarpenter changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All CC|

[Bug 63010] mod_proxy_hcheck when health checks configured, esp. vs down service, consumes large memory

2018-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63010 --- Comment #1 from CFindley --- Created attachment 36324 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36324&action=edit error.log output covering 2-tenths of a second/5k lines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the ass