https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@marcinwilk.eu
--- Comment #9
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk
--- Comment #7 from Yann
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #6 from Jean Weisbuch ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #4)
> Created attachment 36448 [details]
> Don't eat EOS in ap_http_header_filter() for single brigade HEAD responses
> (trunk)
>
> Does this patch work?
The 2.4.x
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #5 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 36449
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36449=edit
Don't eat EOS in ap_http_header_filter() for single brigade HEAD responses
(2.4.x)
This version applies to 2.4.x
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36448|Don't eat EOS in|Don't eat EOS in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 36448
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36448=edit
Don't eat EOS in ap_http_header_filter() for single brigade HEAD responses
Does this patch work?
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #3 from Christophe JAILLET ---
The only modification that occurred in mod_ratelimit in 2.4.34 is r1835168.
I've reverted this commit and the behavior looks correct again (i.e. curl does
not exits with "(52) Empty reply from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #2 from Jean Weisbuch ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> > Since upgrading to 2.4.34
>
> In order to help diagnose the potential regression, which version were you
> using before the upgrade?
It first appeared
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #1 from Christophe JAILLET ---
> Since upgrading to 2.4.34
In order to help diagnose the potential regression, which version were you
using before the upgrade?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
10 matches
Mail list logo