[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ca...@alerque.com --- Comment #17 from

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-10-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ch...@modd.com.au --- Comment #16

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #15 from Sylvain Cresto --- Thanks ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Keywords|

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #13 from Sylvain Cresto --- Yes, in my case : Patch 38043 alone : good Patch 38045 alone : bad Patch 38043 + 38045 : good -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #12 from Yann Ylavic --- Do you mean that 38045 alone is not working? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe,

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #11 from Sylvain Cresto --- OK I've just test those patchs. Patch 38043 is the mandatory patch. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #10 from Ruediger Pluem --- Only one of the patches should be applied. Can you please do tests with only one of them applied? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #9 from Sylvain Cresto --- Hi OK my bad, i haven't applied patch 38043. With patchs 38043 and 38045 it's now correctly working, thank you ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic --- (In reply to Sylvain Cresto from comment #6) > I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works. Please verify that you are running the patched version, I can't reproduce the

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Pluem --- Do you have traces for r->filename with the patch applied? Does the 38043 attached patch help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Sylvain Cresto changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #6 from Sylvain Cresto --- Thanks for your quick reply. OK I have move RewriteRules in correct Directy section. I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works. With fix_uds_filename function from

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38044|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic --- Created attachment 38044 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38044=edit Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme in mod_rewrite [P] Or maybe this one instead since the "unix:" scheme is a [P] thing

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #3 from Yann Ylavic --- Related to bug 57691 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic --- Created attachment 38043 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38043=edit Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme is mod_rewrite Maybe the issue is that mod_rewrite does not consider that a "unix:"

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

2021-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Resolution|---