https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #12 from Fred Morris consult...@m3047.net ---
Wow. Well, there's a lot more to this than I reckoned... for the most part this
discussion is beyond me. I do have one comment: any final dot should be ignored
for comparison purposes.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #13 from Fred Morris consult...@m3047.net ---
See also: bug 57810
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #15 from Fred Morris consult...@m3047.net ---
It's not like compatibility with broken clients isn't a consideration: bug
56241
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810
--- Comment #2 from Fred Morris consult...@m3047.net ---
(In reply to Jean-Luc Duprat from comment #1)
[...]
[ssl:error] [pid 22158] AH02032: Hostname example.com. provided via SNI and
hostname example.com provided via HTTP are different
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #14 from Fred Morris consult...@m3047.net ---
Interesting: bug 56718
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com ---
The SNI is compared against r-hostname, which is a parsed value of the
original Host header (without the port, the trailing dots), supposedly SNI
compatible...
So I wonder if:
1) we
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #11 from Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com ---
Discussion about SNIed connections reuse moved to dev@.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ylavic@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Eissing ste...@eissing.org ---
It cannot be considered a bug when SNI and Host header differ. You cannot
expect all requests on the same connection to have the same Host header either.
Browsers will reuse TLS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
--- Comment #10 from Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com ---
Hmm, so how are we supposed to handle a subsequent request on the same
connection but for a different vhost with differents SSL parameters (eg.
SSLProtocol, CipherSuite, ...),
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Leho Kraav @lkraav l...@kraav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@kraav.com
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
