[Bug 63086] Segmentation fault in mod_cgid

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63086

Joe Orton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |INVALID

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 63086] Segmentation fault in mod_cgid

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63086

Joe Orton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Joe Orton  ---
Maybe best to track downstream unless we've identified it as an upstream bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659768

BTW if you can provide me with all "SSLProtocol" statements in your config
that'd be useful.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 62989] HTML generated by Apache httpd itself is often invalid or uses ancient doctypes (and patches to fix that)

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989

--- Comment #14 from Andra Farkas  ---
(In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #12)
> I agree that updating doc types here is good. And we can add the patches to
> trunk easily. 
> 
> However, I think we cannot backport them for a 2.4.x release. There are
> screenscrapers out there and expierience tells me that we would break at
> least one that is really important to someone.
> 
> Would you agree?

Sure!  If this patch gets into trunk, I'd be happy. :D

If I need to re-do the diffs for trunk, let me know, and let me know the best
way to get the trunk code onto my computer so I can do it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 62989] HTML generated by Apache httpd itself is often invalid or uses ancient doctypes (and patches to fix that)

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989

--- Comment #13 from Mario  ---
+1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 62989] HTML generated by Apache httpd itself is often invalid or uses ancient doctypes (and patches to fix that)

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62989

--- Comment #12 from Stefan Eissing  ---
I agree that updating doc types here is good. And we can add the patches to
trunk easily. 

However, I think we cannot backport them for a 2.4.x release. There are
screenscrapers out there and expierience tells me that we would break at least
one that is really important to someone.

Would you agree?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 63109] Change .xsl to text/xsl in mime.types

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63109

Hendy Irawan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||he...@soluvas.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 63109] New: Change .xsl to text/xsl in mime.types

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63109

Bug ID: 63109
   Summary: Change .xsl to text/xsl in mime.types
   Product: Apache httpd-2
   Version: 2.5-HEAD
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P2
 Component: mod_mime
  Assignee: bugs@httpd.apache.org
  Reporter: he...@soluvas.com
  Target Milestone: ---

According to at least WebKit browsers
(https://stackoverflow.com/a/8245664/122441): There are only 2 valid types for
stylesheets:

* text/css
* text/xsl

Currently mime.types maps .xsl to application/xml which in browsers gives a
warning: "Resource interpreted as document but transferred with MIME type
application/xml." (happens on Safari, Chrome; should happen with other browsers
like Opera, and upcoming Chromium-based Edge)

The proposal is to change .xsl to text/xsl.

Original proposal: https://github.com/jshttp/mime-db/issues/150

Related to bug 55963

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org



[Bug 55963] Add application/ld+json to mime.types

2019-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963

Hendy Irawan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||he...@soluvas.com

--- Comment #1 from Hendy Irawan  ---
I agree with Markus, this should be added.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org