[Bug 40592] flood: corrupt output with report_relative_times

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40592 --- Comment #34 from mehreensiddique --- I have read that knowledge very much. https://open.spotify.com/album/7cx89VbqmYDwNIYPan1FEv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 40592] flood: corrupt output with report_relative_times

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40592 --- Comment #33 from mehreensiddique --- I have read that knowledge very much. https://open.spotify.com/album/7cx89VbqmYDwNIYPan1FEv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 40592] flood: corrupt output with report_relative_times

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40592 --- Comment #32 from mehreensiddique --- I have read that knowledge very much. https://open.spotify.com/album/7cx89VbqmYDwNIYPan1FEv;>Vacuum Sounds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 60182] SSLStaplingFakeTryLater Deviates From Documented Behavior of Only Being Effective When SSLStaplingReturnResponderErrors is On

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60182 --- Comment #9 from gmoni...@gmail.com --- mod_md OCSP stapling looks good. Only the authoritative responses are sent and the chances of being affected by outage are much smaller then with the mod_ssl module OCSP stapling. Too bad that it will

[Bug 28657] mod_negotiation should not store Content-Location header as an error header

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28657 --- Comment #100 from Nat Jackson --- Accepted WONTFIX (private mail discussion). Will await ErrorHeader backporting. https://www.bestmovesuk.co.uk/removals-manchester/;>Removals Manchester -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 63307] apxs gives "use of uninitialized value in concatenation" error

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307 --- Comment #5 from Reshma V Kumar --- This patch worked for me. Will this patch be commited to httpd source code? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 63687] High Memory usage after upgrade to 2.4.41

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63687 --- Comment #62 from Joe Orton --- A technique I've found helpful for catching leaks is: gdb break sbrk cont ... bt full to get a backtrace at the point sbrk is called to expand the heap. Not sure how well this works with a threaded MPM.

[Bug 63687] High Memory usage after upgrade to 2.4.41

2020-03-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63687 --- Comment #61 from Ruediger Pluem --- Next time you experience the issue, can you please provide: 1. ps -e -o pid,comm,vsz,rsz | grep httpd 2. A dump_all_pools from the process that is memory leaking. It should be a child process. If not