DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8000] - Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

2003-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000

Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8000] - Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000

Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-12 15:49 ---
There is no such requirement.  If you have a broken tar which does not maintain 
file 
timestamps, or if you copied the unpacked distribution without maintaining the 
timestamps, 
then make might think it needs to rebuild these files.  We distribute the 
generated 
files... you already have them, you just need to update the timestamps on them 
so that you 
can convince make they're not out-of-date.  Do this: 
 
cd httpd-2.0/modules/ssl 
touch ssl_expr_scan.c 
touch ssl_expr_parse.c 
touch ssl_expr_parse.h  
 
 
Then it should work fine.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8000] - Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8000

Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-12 16:11 ---
It's httpd-2.0.35.tar.gz itself which is broken - the files in question have
incorrect timestamps on them (or have not been pre-built prior to building the
distribution):

bash-2.03$ gtar tzvf httpd-2.0.35.tar.gz | grep ssl_expr_
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff 10300 2002-03-13 20:47
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_eval.c
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff 34302 2002-01-10 00:28
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.c
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff   510 2002-01-10 00:28
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.h
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff  6802 2002-03-13 20:47
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.y
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff 49142 2002-03-13 20:47
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.c
-rw-r--r-- rbb/staff  6492 2002-03-13 20:47
httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.l
bash-2.03$