Re: system/6360: pkg_info -E

2010-04-18 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:55:57 +0100 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/04/18 14:38, Antti Harri wrote: > > >It still makes more sense to just match 'filename', either > > >directory or regular file, as currently (but incorrectly) stated > > >in the man page. It's the path of least surprise. > > >

Re: system/6360: pkg_info -E

2010-04-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/04/18 14:38, Antti Harri wrote: > >It still makes more sense to just match 'filename', either directory or > >regular file, as currently (but incorrectly) stated in the man page. > >It's the path of least surprise. > > You can already do that with the help of pkg_mklocatedb(1). > > For a

Re: system/6360: pkg_info -E

2010-04-18 Thread Antti Harri
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:01:15 +0930 Matthew Haub wrote: Hello, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:10:30PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: Description: The `-E` flag of pkg_info no longer works. This might be a known issue or possibly documentation lagging behind

Re: system/6360: pkg_info -E

2010-04-18 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:01:15 +0930 Matthew Haub wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:10:30PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: > > >Description: > > The `-E` flag of pkg_info no longer works. This might be a known > > issue or possibly documentation lagging behind recent changes. > > > > Ther

Re: system/6360: pkg_info -E

2010-04-18 Thread Matthew Haub
Hello, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:10:30PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: > >Description: > The `-E` flag of pkg_info no longer works. This might be a known issue > or possibly documentation lagging behind recent changes. > > There's really no need for the `-E` flag to exist in pkg_info. > > >How-To-R