The attached patch adds an x option to rm(1) to avoid cross
filesystem boundaries.
This has been committed to DragonFlyBSD and FreeBSD. It has been
submitted to NetBSD as well.
--
Eitan Adler
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of
On 26 April 2013 14:30, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
The attached patch adds an x option to rm(1) to avoid cross
filesystem boundaries.
This has been committed to DragonFlyBSD and FreeBSD. It has been
submitted to NetBSD as well.
Inline:
Index: rm.c
On 2013/04/26 14:30, Eitan Adler wrote:
The attached patch adds an x option to rm(1) to avoid cross
filesystem boundaries.
Isn't it better to just use find(1)'s -x option for this? It would be silly
to add an option like this to all the places where it might be useful (besides
rm this type of
On 26 April 2013 18:34, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2013/04/26 14:30, Eitan Adler wrote:
The attached patch adds an x option to rm(1) to avoid cross
filesystem boundaries.
Isn't it better to just use find(1)'s -x option for this? It would be silly
to add an option like
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 26 April 2013 18:34, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2013/04/26 14:30, Eitan Adler wrote:
The attached patch adds an x option to rm(1) to avoid cross
filesystem boundaries.
Isn't it better to just use find(1)'s -x option for
On 26 April 2013 20:05, Philip Guenther guent...@sendmail.com wrote:
We had a similar conversion on -hackers:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Some-improvements-to-rm-1-td5806672.html#none
Note that OpenBSD doesn't have cp -x either.
Ah, I see. I sent this patch because { Free, Net,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 20:17, Eitan Adler wrote:
Ah, I see. I sent this patch because { Free, Net, DragonFly } BSD all
have this feature. After some private discussion I found out that
OpenBSD has a much strong aversion to non-POSIX features than the
others.
fwiw, they did this, you
On 27 April 2013 00:57, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 20:17, Eitan Adler wrote:
Ah, I see. I sent this patch because { Free, Net, DragonFly } BSD all
have this feature. After some private discussion I found out that
OpenBSD has a much strong aversion to
