Hello,
I recently lost access to a co-located server, because I used a
non-standard port for ssh access.
The default pf-ruleset (in /etc/rc) had kicked in.
Would it be more correct to have the rulset in /etc/rc use
/etc/services instead of hardcoding port 22 into the rule?
Something like
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:34:47AM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
So, what could be the problem then? Theoretically it did work as of the
1.35 if_bce.c revision which seems to have shipped in OpenBSD 5.0. This
message:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=130217668909255
seems to verify that
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:04:44 +0100
From: Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:34:47AM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
So, what could be the problem then? Theoretically it did work as of the
1.35 if_bce.c revision which seems to have shipped in OpenBSD 5.0. This
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:47:28PM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
The machine currently has the 1GB DIMM in it. I tested the patch and it
seems to work with = 1GB RAM. ping -f test returned similar results so
performance likely isn't affected.
On 2015-01-21 18:36, John Merriam wrote:
On 1/21/2015 1:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
There is supposed to be a bounce buffer in bce to cope with
systems with more than 1GB but perhaps it is broken.
I installed the old 1GB DIMM that came with the machine when I
acquired it, and you are
On 2015/01/22 09:12, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
The default value for 'ssh' in /etc/services would be 22. So you're
going to have to remember to change either /etc/pf.conf or
/etc/services to avoid the problem. You don't describe enough of your
situation to make clear why editing
On 1/22/2015 3:40 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:38:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:04:44 +0100
From: Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name
It looks as if some ring descriptor data is still being allocated with
On 1/22/2015 12:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
It looks as if some ring descriptor data is still being allocated with
bus_dmamem_alloc(). That function probably doesn't respect the mapping
constraints bce(4) hardware requires.
This diff makes bce use the same memory allocation APIs as bwi(4) is
On 2015/01/22 11:34, John Merriam wrote:
On 2015-01-21 18:36, John Merriam wrote:
On 1/21/2015 1:43 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
There is supposed to be a bounce buffer in bce to cope with
systems with more than 1GB but perhaps it is broken.
I installed the old 1GB DIMM that came with the
On 2015/01/22 17:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Would presumably be a change in uvm somewhere. (paddr_t)(0x4000 - 1)
is passed as 'high' to uvm_km_kmemalloc_pla - uvm_pglistalloc and is
meant to constrain the addresses.
Identifying when (at least which release) it broke might be a good
My bad, forgot to add bugs@openbsd.org in my reply to Ken, here it is
for the record.
The default value for 'ssh' in /etc/services would be 22. So
you're
going to have to remember to change either /etc/pf.conf or
/etc/services to avoid the problem. You don't describe enough of
your
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:47:28PM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
The machine currently has the 1GB DIMM in it. I tested the patch and it
seems to work with = 1GB RAM. ping -f test returned similar results so
performance likely isn't affected.
You sure? This would be the first time I wrote a
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:38:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:04:44 +0100
From: Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:34:47AM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
So, what could be the problem then? Theoretically it did
On 2015-01-22 12:04, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:34:47AM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
So, what could be the problem then? Theoretically it did work as of
the
1.35 if_bce.c revision which seems to have shipped in OpenBSD 5.0.
This
message:
On 22 January 2015 at 07:59, b...@avalanic.dk wrote:
Hello,
I recently lost access to a co-located server, because I used a non-standard
port for ssh access.
The default pf-ruleset (in /etc/rc) had kicked in.
Would it be more correct to have the rulset in /etc/rc use /etc/services
On 2015-01-22 15:40, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:38:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:04:44 +0100
From: Stefan Sperling s...@stsp.name
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:34:47AM -0500, John Merriam wrote:
So, what could be the
16 matches
Mail list logo
