Re: OpenBSD 6.1 with syspatch 14 crash

2017-07-08 Thread Mike Cole
On 7/8/2017 10:44 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Mike Cole wrote: I can't use sendbug because it only boots to ddb. This is OpenBSD 6.1 with latest syspatch 14 running in byhve under FreeBSD. This is a bug in bhyve. c.f. http://marc.info/?t=14913605473=1=3

Re: OpenBSD 6.1 with syspatch 14 crash

2017-07-08 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, Mike Cole wrote: > I can't use sendbug because it only boots to ddb. This is OpenBSD 6.1 with > latest syspatch 14 running in byhve under FreeBSD. This is a bug in bhyve. c.f. http://marc.info/?t=14913605473=1=3 Philip Guenther

OpenBSD 6.1 with syspatch 14 crash

2017-07-08 Thread Mike Cole
I can't use sendbug because it only boots to ddb. This is OpenBSD 6.1 with latest syspatch 14 running in byhve under FreeBSD. Here is all the output I have: [ no symbol table formats found ] Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All

Re: libtls.so is missing from base61.tgz set

2017-07-08 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 08:38:37AM -0400, RD Thrush wrote: > >Synopsis:libtls.so is missing from base61.tgz set > >Category:system > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 6.1 > Details : OpenBSD 6.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #93: Thu Jul 6 15:41:21 > MDT 2017 >

Re: panic: Stopped at kqueue_scan

2017-07-08 Thread Aaron Bieber
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:51:05PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 06/07/17(Thu) 21:18, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:29:39AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > > Hola, > > > > > > For roughly a week I have been able to reliably produce panics on > > > amd64

libtls.so is missing from base61.tgz set

2017-07-08 Thread RD Thrush
>Synopsis: libtls.so is missing from base61.tgz set >Category: system >Environment: System : OpenBSD 6.1 Details : OpenBSD 6.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #93: Thu Jul 6 15:41:21 MDT 2017

Re: canaries can cause malloc with a size of 0 to hang

2017-07-08 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:50:51PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > I think I found it: requested size is not recorded for malloc(0), > > bp->offset is not initialized in that case. Other code is carefull not to > > use ->offset for size == 0. > > OA > > -Otto > > OA from

Re: panic: Stopped at kqueue_scan

2017-07-08 Thread Pavel Korovin
On 07/07, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Here's a fix. The problem certainly comes from a contented NET_LOCK() > which means that we now have a sleeping point where we're not allowed > to sleep. > > Diff below revert the solock()/sounlock() dances in the kqueue filters, > let me know if it works for