On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:56:32PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Note that sending an error reply to packets that cannot be processed
> > is not uncommon and sometimes required to make the network behave
> > smoothly.
>
> Ahh
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Do you have a "block return" in your pf.conf?
Yes.
> Does it work differently if you disable pf with pfctl -d?
Yes it does. No return packet.
> How does your pf.conf filter to such packets?
I think it's the default pf.conf, I
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:04:17PM +0200, p...@delphinusdns.org wrote:
> >Synopsis:IP Information leakage using MAC address
> >Category:system
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.1
> Details : OpenBSD 7.1 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Sun May 15 10:27:01 MDT 2022
>
>Synopsis: IP Information leakage using MAC address
>Category: system
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.1
Details : OpenBSD 7.1 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Sun May 15 10:27:01 MDT 2022
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:11:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Try disabling iAMT in bios.
>
> If that helps it may be possible to workaround if the right places can be
> found, see the patch in comment 7 on
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
WTF!! What is that ultra
Try disabling iAMT in bios.
If that helps it may be possible to workaround if the right places can be
found, see the patch in comment 7 on
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10990
On 2022/08/22 13:17, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This bug:
>
>
Hi,
This bug:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=156682947025229
is still present in the latest snapshot.
Perhaps that bug report was too noisy. Let's explain the issue again.
The machine is a HP dc7700, its ethernet card is a Intel 82566DM
Gigabit, listed in em(4) as supported. With
