On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:05:42PM -0400, Scott Walters wrote:
> Sorry, this is not a real report. I forgot to try to do Control Alt Escape
> to get the
> ddb> prompt, and it didn't come up on its own even though ddb.panic is 1 in
> sysctl.
> I switched to the non-SMP 7.3 kernel after that
> The project would be better off if you weren't so abrasive to folks
> that honestly want to help things and have real user feedback. I get
> that you may not care, but it is sad to witness.
No, really, you are the one took it abrasive.
I replied with my THOUGHTFUL perpective on why the manual
Oh you hurt my feelings.
However, I am glad you got that off your chest.
Christoff Humphries wrote:
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Monday, October 9th, 2023 at 12:16 PM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Christoff Humphries christoff@deadbeef.monster wrote:
> >
> > > >
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 9th, 2023 at 12:16 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>
>
> Christoff Humphries christoff@deadbeef.monster wrote:
>
> > > Marc Espie marc.espie.open...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:58:27PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
Christoff Humphries wrote:
> > Marc Espie marc.espie.open...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:58:27PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > >
> > > > > So tldr: `man backtrace` should name the required linker flag
> > > > > (-lexecinfo)
> > > >
> > > > from mdoc(7):
> > > >
>
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, October 9th, 2023 at 1:31 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>
>
> Marc Espie marc.espie.open...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:58:27PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >
> > > > So tldr: `man backtrace` should name the required
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 08:58:25AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 04:14:33AM +, Asa Yeamans wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I recently stumbled across a bug in bgpd where when announcing connected
> > routes (i.e. network $AF connected) for IPv6 routes over IPv4 TCP BGP
>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 04:14:33AM +, Asa Yeamans wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I recently stumbled across a bug in bgpd where when announcing connected
> routes (i.e. network $AF connected) for IPv6 routes over IPv4 TCP BGP
> connections, bgpd was announcing the IPv6 routes with a next hop of ::1,
