On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:23:51AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > we're working toward dropping the need for NET_LOCK before PF_LOCK. could
> > we try the diff below as a compromise?
> >
>
> sashan@ and mvs@ have pushed that forward, so this diff should be enough
> now.
This diff has been
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 07:09:39PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:29:37AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > With this diff against -current - my dmesg is spammed with:
> >
> > splassert: pfsync_delete_state: want 2 have 0
> > Starting stack
On 11/24/22 13:09, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:29:37AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
With this diff against -current - my dmesg is spammed with:
splassert: pfsync_delete_state: want 2 have 0
Starting stack trace...
pfsync_delete_state(fd820af9f940) at
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:23:51AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > we're working toward dropping the need for NET_LOCK before PF_LOCK. could
> > we try the diff below as a compromise?
> >
>
> sashan@ and mvs@ have pushed that forward, so this diff should be enough
> now.
I have tested the
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:29:37AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> > >
>
> With this diff against -current - my dmesg is spammed with:
>
> splassert: pfsync_delete_state: want 2 have 0
> Starting stack trace...
> pfsync_delete_state(fd820af9f940) at pfsync_delete_state+0x58
>
On 11/24/22 04:59, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:23:51AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
we're working toward dropping the need for NET_LOCK before PF_LOCK. could
we try the diff below as a compromise?
sashan@ and mvs@ have pushed that forward, so this diff
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:23:51AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> >
> > we're working toward dropping the need for NET_LOCK before PF_LOCK. could
> > we try the diff below as a compromise?
> >
>
> sashan@ and mvs@ have pushed that forward, so this diff should be enough
> now.
>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:49:35AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 08:53:52PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:28:35 +0100
> > > From: Alexander Bluhm
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Some of my test machines hang while booting userland.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 08:53:52PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:28:35 +0100
> > From: Alexander Bluhm
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some of my test machines hang while booting userland.
> >
> > starting network
> > -> here it hangs
> > load: 0.02 cmd: ifconfig 81303 [sbar]
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:28:35 +0100
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> Hi,
>
> Some of my test machines hang while booting userland.
>
> starting network
> -> here it hangs
> load: 0.02 cmd: ifconfig 81303 [sbar] 0.00u 0.15s 0% 78k
>
> ddb shows these two processes.
>
> 81303 375320 89140
Hi,
Some of my test machines hang while booting userland.
starting network
-> here it hangs
load: 0.02 cmd: ifconfig 81303 [sbar] 0.00u 0.15s 0% 78k
ddb shows these two processes.
81303 375320 89140 0 3 0x3 sbar ifconfig
48135 157353 0 0 3 0x14200
11 matches
Mail list logo