On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 21:59:12 +1000
> > From: Jonathan Gray
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:47:50PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > On a hunch I added additional parameter checks to task_add(9) and
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 21:59:12 +1000
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:47:50PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On a hunch I added additional parameter checks to task_add(9) and
> > task_del(9) and caught intel(4) doing something strange.
> >
> > The patch is
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:47:50PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a hunch I added additional parameter checks to task_add(9) and
> task_del(9) and caught intel(4) doing something strange.
>
> The patch is straightforward: check that the taskq pointer tq is not
> NULL. In the current
Hi,
On a hunch I added additional parameter checks to task_add(9) and
task_del(9) and caught intel(4) doing something strange.
The patch is straightforward: check that the taskq pointer tq is not
NULL. In the current code we return early if a flag is set or cleared
in the task w, in which case