On Sep 18 2022, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:19:15PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > I'll see if I can reproduce this on another 965 machine.
>
> I don't see any errors with fvwm2 on mobile 965 (x61).
I can not reproduce it in my thinkpad T410 either (same snapshot).
For me
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 10:40:29PM +0200, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:22:41AM -0700, Stephan Somogyi wrote:
>
> > Starting with arm64 snapshot kernel 1818 and continuing to 1822, the latest
> > snapshot, I've been experiencing a persistent problem with the RPi3's USB
> >
The rockpro64 no longer boots in multi-user on -current. It hangs after
displaying the following lines:
rkiis0 at mainbus0
rkiis1 at mainbus0
The 8/09 snapshot works, the next one from 11/09 doesn't.
bsd.rd still boots.
Dmesg below.
OpenBSD 7.2-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1815: Thu Sep 8 13:20:08
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> The rockpro64 no longer boots in multi-user on -current. It hangs after
> displaying the following lines:
>
> rkiis0 at mainbus0
> rkiis1 at mainbus0
>
> The 8/09 snapshot works, the next one from 11/09 doesn't.
Smells like a
Within the original OpenBSD installation I turned off http/2 within
Firefox but still received the same error.
Firefox's console did not display any errors associated the website.
On the same machine as I was running OpenBSD I installed Ubuntu 20.04 to
a new HD. After booting into Ubuntu I
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:59:20PM -0700, Michael Truog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was attempting to have a RAID 5 softraid0 setup on a sparc64 machine (boot
> log output below) but ran into problems when attempting to create a single
> partition with the size 5.5TB (RAID 5 with 4 x 2TB hard drives). I
I won't know for certain for a few more hours, but initially this looks to
have fixed it. Thank you.
So far it seems that the fix has also caused a small performance decrease —
~5-10% as measured via several sftp transfers — but this measurement was
very unscientific.
When I first booted with
On Sep 18 2022, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Sep 18 2022, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > On Sep 18 2022, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:19:15PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > > I'll see if I can reproduce this on another 965 machine.
> > >
> > > I don't
All the machines use the same network?
Do you have one single outwards-facing IP?
Could it be that the FF under OBSD is NOT holding to the TCP connections,
therefore you appear to the bank as you come from two different IP addresses
(due to NAT spreading across the public IP set)?
FV
>
On Sep 18 2022, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Sep 18 2022, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:19:15PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > I'll see if I can reproduce this on another 965 machine.
> >
> > I don't see any errors with fvwm2 on mobile 965 (x61).
>
> I can not
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:35:51AM -0700, Stephan Somogyi wrote:
> I won't know for certain for a few more hours, but initially this looks to
> have fixed it. Thank you.
Cool, thanks for reporting and testing! The fix is committed now.
> So far it seems that the fix has also caused a small
After more testing I can no longer repro the issue. Thanks for the quick
turn-around.
s.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 2:12 PM Marcus Glocker wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:35:51AM -0700, Stephan Somogyi wrote:
>
> > I won't know for certain for a few more hours, but initially this looks
> to
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:57:18PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Sep 18 2022, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > On Sep 18 2022, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > On Sep 18 2022, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:19:15PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
