[PATCH] add a link to the 7.5 errata

--- security.html | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security.html b/security.html index 38b427bb9..eb7f9e0e4 100644 --- a/security.html +++ b/security.html @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ For security advisories for specific releases, click below: 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, -7.4.

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:26:15PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Then send me the pcap file off-list. > Received, off-list, thanks! The config looks fine. Channel 48, HT secondary channel below at 44, 80 MHz VHT center channel 42. This is a valid config that will pass the tests we added to

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

Hi, thanks for the input! I sadly don't have any other OBSD machine on this lan, so i can't do any tcpbench test right now :( I hovewer did a test with fast.com (same LAN, same router, same computer): - OpenBSD did 4Mbps down, 20 up - Debian 12.5 did 300Mbps down and 20 up. Something is

security(8) spams "Device not configured" daily

Hello everyone! To reproduce the following, a laptop and two USB sticks are enough. 1) Plug them in and create a RAID 1C or crypto. One stick is the key, the other contains the array partition(s). 2) Run bioctl softraid0. Ensure everything is as expected. 3) Detach the key stick. 4) Run

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

On 2024/04/29 09:19, Mizsei Zoltán wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the input! I sadly don't have any other OBSD machine on this lan, > so i can't do any tcpbench test right now :( How about iperf? (iperf2 usually preferred over iperf3). > I hovewer did a test with fast.com (same LAN, same router,

Re: problem with qwx on thinkpad arm

On 28/04/2024 17:59, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:46:22PM +0200, BESSOT Jean-Michel wrote: Hello Hello qwx does not work after the last snapshot. There is an error message in dmesg that I send. If you need more information feel free to ask. bye qwx0: could not

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:19:49AM +0200, Mizsei Zoltán wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the input! I sadly don't have any other OBSD machine on this lan, > so i can't do any tcpbench test right now :( > > I hovewer did a test with fast.com (same LAN, same router, same computer): > - OpenBSD did

sysupgrade boot.bin apply m1 boot failure

>Synopsis: sysupgrade to latest snap results in bootloop, had to replace >boot.bin >Category: system aarch64 >Environment: System : OpenBSD 7.5 Details : OpenBSD 7.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #19: Sun Apr 28 13:44:22 MDT 2024

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

Yes, it is a general speed regression. Reboot didn1t help. Firmware is up-to-date, and AFAIK nothing else changed. The bottleneck is there in cli aswell, not just in Firefox. -- ext Mikhail Pchelin írta 2024. ápr.. 29, H-n 18:13 órakor: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:19:49AM +0200, Mizsei Zoltán

Re: sysupgrade boot.bin apply m1 boot failure

> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:58:25 -0600 (MDT) > From: bo...@plexuscomp.com > > >Synopsis:sysupgrade to latest snap results in bootloop, had to replace > >boot.bin > >Category:system aarch64 > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 7.5 > Details : OpenBSD 7.5-current

Re: sysupgrade boot.bin apply m1 boot failure

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:58:25PM GMT, bo...@plexuscomp.com wrote: > >Synopsis:sysupgrade to latest snap results in bootloop, had to replace > >boot.bin > >Category:system aarch64 > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 7.5 > Details : OpenBSD 7.5-current (GENERIC.MP)

Re: iwm regression in 7.5 amd64

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:05:31PM +0200, Mizsei Zoltán wrote: > Yes, it is a general speed regression. Reboot didn1t help. Firmware is > up-to-date, and AFAIK nothing else changed. The bottleneck is there in cli > aswell, not just in Firefox. > > -- ext The only possibility I can think of is