On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:07:56PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:27:58PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:33:42AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > i get
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:27:58PM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:33:42AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i get this trying to use usb tethering w/android on
> > > edgerouter lite latest(or
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:33:42AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i get this trying to use usb tethering w/android on
> > edgerouter lite latest(or very close) snap GENERIC.MP:
> > urndis0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1
>Synopsis: Feature request httpd location match / pass URI
>Category: user
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.2
Details : OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #5: Fri Feb 2 23:02:19 CET 2018
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 09:57:39AM -0200, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I am trying to apply binary patches on 6.1 and syspatch isn't able to find
> them
>
> on 6.2 works as expected.
>
> syspatch
> -l
>
>
> 001_dhcpd
> 002_vmmfpu
> 003_libressl
> 004_softraid_concat
>
Hello guys,
I am trying to apply binary patches on 6.1 and syspatch isn't able to find
them
on 6.2 works as expected.
syspatch
-l
001_dhcpd
002_vmmfpu
003_libressl
004_softraid_concat
005_pf_src_tracking
006_libssl
007_freetype
008_exec_subr
009_icmp_opts
010_perl
012_wsmux
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 09:32:41AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > machdep.forceukbd=1 feels broken to me, as i use "sv", and it doesn't
> > respect
> > /etc/kbdtype.
> > caused nothing but my time being
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> machdep.forceukbd=1 feels broken to me, as i use "sv", and it doesn't respect
> /etc/kbdtype.
> caused nothing but my time being (not-so-well-)wasted, because i forgot having
> just added forceukbd=1 && this 'quirk' being
Hi,
machdep.forceukbd=1 feels broken to me, as i use "sv", and it doesn't respect
/etc/kbdtype.
caused nothing but my time being (not-so-well-)wasted, because i forgot having
just added forceukbd=1 && this 'quirk' being undocumented. so maybe a docbug.
just wanted to make a note of this